reply to discussion |
Results 1 to 8 of 8
- 08-10-2011, 08:32 AM #1John NavasGuest
<http://insurancenewsnet.com/article.aspx?id=272330&type=newswires>
› See More: NEWS: Bursor & Fisher Law Firm Announces more than 1,000 AT&T Customers to File Arbitration Cases Challenging AT&T's Takeover of T-Mobile; AT&T Acknowledges these Cases Place the $39 Billion Merger "In Jeopardy"
- 08-10-2011, 09:24 AM #2NewsGuest
Re: NEWS: Bursor & Fisher Law Firm Announces more than 1,000 AT&TCustomers to File Arbitration Cases Challenging AT&T's Takeover of T-Mobile;AT&T Acknowledges these Cases Place the $39 Billion Merger "In Jeopardy"
On 8/10/2011 10:32 AM, John Navas wrote:
> <http://insurancenewsnet.com/article.aspx?id=272330&type=newswires>
LOL. Prove your "damages".
- 08-10-2011, 02:48 PM #3tlvpGuest
Re: NEWS: Bursor & Fisher Law Firm Announces more than 1,000 AT&TCustomers to File Arbitration Cases Challenging AT&T's Takeover of T-Mobile;AT&T Acknowledges these Cases Place the $39 Billion Merger "In Jeopardy"
On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 11:24:05 -0400, News <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 8/10/2011 10:32 AM, John Navas wrote:
>> <http://insurancenewsnet.com/article.aspx?id=272330&type=newswires>
>
>
> LOL. Prove your "damages".
I'm a bit surprised: I'd have thought attws customers would *benefit* from
the new availability of (to-be-former) T-Mobile network to register on, and
that it was the T-Mobile customers who should object to getting forced onto
the oversubscribed attws network.
But who can know what lurks in the heart or the mind of the devious lawyer?
-- Not even "The Phantom" knows ... :-) .
Cheers, -- tlvp
--
Avant de repondre, jeter la poubelle, SVP
- 08-10-2011, 06:05 PM #4CameoGuest
Re: NEWS: Bursor & Fisher Law Firm Announces more than 1,000 AT&T Customers to File Arbitration Cases Challenging AT&T's Takeover of T-Mobile; AT&T Acknowledges these Cases Place the $39 Billion Merger "In Jeopardy"
"News" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On 8/10/2011 10:32 AM, John Navas wrote:
>> <http://insurancenewsnet.com/article.aspx?id=272330&type=newswires>
>
>
> LOL. Prove your "damages".
AT&T Acknowledges these Cases Place the $39 Billion Merger "In
Jeopardy," therefore we, T-Mo customers, welcome the lawsuit.
- 08-10-2011, 07:37 PM #5Steve SobolGuest
Re: NEWS: Bursor & Fisher Law Firm Announces more than 1,000 AT&T Customers to File Arbitration Cases Challenging AT&T's Takeover of T-Mobile; AT&T Acknowledges these Cases Place the $39 Billion Merger "In Jeopardy"
In article <[email protected]>, tlvp says...
>
> On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 11:24:05 -0400, News <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On 8/10/2011 10:32 AM, John Navas wrote:
> >> <http://insurancenewsnet.com/article.aspx?id=272330&type=newswires>
> >
> >
> > LOL. Prove your "damages".
>
> I'm a bit surprised: I'd have thought attws customers would *benefit* from
> the new availability of (to-be-former) T-Mobile network to register on, and
> that it was the T-Mobile customers who should object to getting forced onto
> the oversubscribed attws network.
>
> But who can know what lurks in the heart or the mind of the devious lawyer?
> -- Not even "The Phantom" knows ... :-) .
I'm opposed, as a T-Mobile customer, but ATT customers should be opposed
too. A significant decrease in competition will make it easier for ATT
to screw EVERYONE - legacy ATT customers and legacy T-Mobile customers
alike.
I haven't been an ATT customer since leaving Ohio in 2003. They tried to
steal from me the year before I moved to California. They failed, but
only because I got the Ohio PUC on their slimy asses. As opposed to
Verizon, which is primarily just stupid, ATT is pure evil. (Former ATT
customer, current Verizon customer; here in Apple Valley, CA, they are
the local phone company.)
--
Steve Sobol - Programming/WebDev/IT Support
[email protected]
- 08-10-2011, 08:41 PM #6tlvpGuest
Re: NEWS: Bursor & Fisher Law Firm Announces more than 1,000 AT&TCustomers to File Arbitration Cases Challenging AT&T's Takeover of T-Mobile;AT&T Acknowledges these Cases Place the $39 Billion Merger "In Jeopardy"
On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 21:37:39 -0400, Steve Sobol <[email protected]> wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>, tlvp says...
>>
>> On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 11:24:05 -0400, News <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > On 8/10/2011 10:32 AM, John Navas wrote:
>> >> <http://insurancenewsnet.com/article.aspx?id=272330&type=newswires>
>> >
>> >
>> > LOL. Prove your "damages".
>>
>> I'm a bit surprised: I'd have thought attws customers would *benefit* from
>> the new availability of (to-be-former) T-Mobile network to register on, and
>> that it was the T-Mobile customers who should object to getting forced onto
>> the oversubscribed attws network.
>>
>> But who can know what lurks in the heart or the mind of the devious lawyer?
>> -- Not even "The Phantom" knows ... :-) .
>
> I'm opposed, as a T-Mobile customer, but ATT customers should be opposed
> too. A significant decrease in competition will make it easier for ATT
> to screw EVERYONE - legacy ATT customers and legacy T-Mobile customers
> alike.
Once Sprint, Cricket, Pocket, VirginMobile, and AllTel go into some other
carriers' pockets, you're right: an at&t/VZW duopoly bodes ill for all :-{ .
> I haven't been an ATT customer since leaving Ohio in 2003. They tried to
> steal from me the year before I moved to California. They failed, but
> only because I got the Ohio PUC on their slimy asses. As opposed to
> Verizon, which is primarily just stupid, ATT is pure evil. (Former ATT
> customer, current Verizon customer; here in Apple Valley, CA, they are
> the local phone company.)
Well, SJS, heads up, and caveat emptor in good health. Cheers, -- tlvp
--
Avant de repondre, jeter la poubelle, SVP
- 08-10-2011, 09:50 PM #7Steve SobolGuest
Re: NEWS: Bursor & Fisher Law Firm Announces more than 1,000 AT&T Customers to File Arbitration Cases Challenging AT&T's Takeover of T-Mobile; AT&T Acknowledges these Cases Place the $39 Billion Merger "In Jeopardy"
In article <[email protected]>, tlvp says...
>
> Once Sprint, Cricket, Pocket, VirginMobile, and AllTel go into some other
> carriers' pockets, you're right: an at&t/VZW duopoly bodes ill for all :-{ .
As far as I knew, Alltel was dead. The pieces that didn't go to VZ went
to AT&T.
I see that alltel.com is still online, but I put in 44122 -- the zip
code in Greater Cleveland where I grew up; Cleveland became Alltel's
largest market after the merger that created VZW -- and they are no
longer providing service there.
Apparently, they have fewer than a million customers now:
"On April 26, 2010, Atlantic Tele-Network acquired the remaining 26
divested Alltel markets, including licenses, network assets and 800,000
subscribers. [5] These remaining markets continue to be operated by
Allied Wireless, a subsidiary of ATN, under the Alltel name. [6]"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alltel
So, Alltel doesn't count as they no longer exist in most markets and
wouldn't be a viable nationwide competitor.
The flat-rate prepaid carriers like Cricket, MetroPCS, and others depend
on the big guys for nationwide roaming, so there's a big issue there.
Sprint/Virgin would be the only real competition for VZW and a combined
AT&T/T-Mo, and I'm not sure how well they're doing.
> Well, SJS, heads up, and caveat emptor in good health. Cheers, -- tlvp
Yeah, yeah, I know, but thanks anyhow
--
Steve Sobol - Programming/WebDev/IT Support
[email protected]
- 08-11-2011, 05:23 AM #8NewsGuest
Re: NEWS: Bursor & Fisher Law Firm Announces more than 1,000 AT&TCustomers to File Arbitration Cases Challenging AT&T's Takeover of T-Mobile;AT&T Acknowledges these Cases Place the $39 Billion Merger "In Jeopardy"
On 8/10/2011 10:41 PM, tlvp wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 21:37:39 -0400, Steve Sobol <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> In article <[email protected]>, tlvp says...
>>>
>>> On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 11:24:05 -0400, News <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> > On 8/10/2011 10:32 AM, John Navas wrote:
>>> >> <http://insurancenewsnet.com/article.aspx?id=272330&type=newswires>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > LOL. Prove your "damages".
>>>
>>> I'm a bit surprised: I'd have thought attws customers would *benefit*
>>> from
>>> the new availability of (to-be-former) T-Mobile network to register
>>> on, and
>>> that it was the T-Mobile customers who should object to getting
>>> forced onto
>>> the oversubscribed attws network.
>>>
>>> But who can know what lurks in the heart or the mind of the devious
>>> lawyer?
>>> -- Not even "The Phantom" knows ... :-) .
>>
>> I'm opposed, as a T-Mobile customer, but ATT customers should be opposed
>> too. A significant decrease in competition will make it easier for ATT
>> to screw EVERYONE - legacy ATT customers and legacy T-Mobile customers
>> alike.
>
> Once Sprint, Cricket, Pocket, VirginMobile, and AllTel go into some other
> carriers' pockets, you're right: an at&t/VZW duopoly bodes ill for all
> :-{ .
>
>> I haven't been an ATT customer since leaving Ohio in 2003. They tried to
>> steal from me the year before I moved to California. They failed, but
>> only because I got the Ohio PUC on their slimy asses. As opposed to
>> Verizon, which is primarily just stupid, ATT is pure evil. (Former ATT
>> customer, current Verizon customer; here in Apple Valley, CA, they are
>> the local phone company.)
>
> Well, SJS, heads up, and caveat emptor in good health. Cheers, -- tlvp
Those are proper antitrust arguments, not "damages".
What are the best ways to retain employees of your company?
in Chit Chat