Results 16 to 22 of 22
- 01-29-2005, 07:47 PM #16Jack ZwickGuest
Re: Unchanged AT&T WIreless stores to remain?
In article <[email protected]>,
Tropical Haven <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>Teams of Cingular employees spent Sunday night fully converting 1,055
> >>>former AT&T Wireless company-owned stores into Cingular stores.
> >>
> >>You said it yourself -- "1,055 former AT&T Wireless company-owned
> >>stores", it DID NOT say ALL former AT&T Wireless company-owned stores.
> >
> >
> > Read it. The ones not done were "agent locations", not company stores.
> > Jeeez
>
> That's still not what it said. It basically said agent stores were
> going to be switching over in the foreseeable future. It still didn't
> mentional ALL ATTWS corporate stores.
Yes it did, and you know it otherwise you wouldn't have snipped out the
link.
<http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/mi...8644&TICK=CING
UL1&STORY=/www/story/11-16-2004/0002458939&EDATE=Nov+16,+2004>
› See More: Unchanged AT&T WIreless stores to remain?
- 01-29-2005, 08:03 PM #17John S.Guest
Re: Unchanged AT&T WIreless stores to remain?
>http://www.expressnewsline.com/0805/...bc+buying+tele
com-status-19-newsID-20.html
This was a very poorly and un-informed story but the rest were intersting.
I had not seen any of them. Considering that the USA Today story was market Jan
28th, I just missed it as I came home for the weekend.
But thank you for showing them to me!
--
John S.
e-mail responses to - john at kiana dot net
- 01-29-2005, 08:11 PM #18Jack ZwickGuest
Re: Unchanged AT&T WIreless stores to remain?
In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected]pamfree (John S.) wrote:
> >http://www.expressnewsline.com/0805/...bc+buying+tele
> com-status-19-newsID-20.html
>
> This was a very poorly and un-informed story but the rest were intersting.
>
> I had not seen any of them. Considering that the USA Today story was market
> Jan
> 28th, I just missed it as I came home for the weekend.
>
> But thank you for showing them to me!
>
> --
> John S.
> e-mail responses to - john at kiana dot net
<http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor.../bs_usatoday/s
bcatamptdiscussmerger>
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/s...toryId=4470328
http://www.rednova.com/news/display/?id=122778
<http://www.expressnewsline.com/0805/...sbc+buying+tel
ecom-status-19-newsID-20.html>
http://www.suntimes.com/output/busin...fin-sbc28.html
<http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...1/28/MNGGNB222
51.DTL>
<http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor.../telecoms_att_
dc_17>
<http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor...lt_afp/uscompa
nytelecomatt_050127221811>
<http://www.fool.com/News/mft/2005/mf...ptyholnk303100
&logvisit=y&npu=y>
Make sure you snip out the other links so it looks like only missed one
story. The story was all over the 27 and the 28th.
- 02-01-2005, 04:54 AM #19John NavasGuest
Re: Unchanged AT&T WIreless stores to remain?
[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
In <[email protected]> on Sat, 29 Jan
2005 20:19:10 GMT, Jack Zwick <[email protected]> wrote:
>In article <[email protected]>,
> Joseph <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 11:15:14 GMT, Jack Zwick <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <[email protected]>,
>> > "JohnF" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Jack, you need to get over this obsession you have with their signs. I'm
>> >> glad they're worrying about things that matter. Maybe they're still
>> >> deciding
>> >> which stores to keep and don't want to sink money in changing signs that
>> >> they're going to close? Who cares?
>> >
>> >Did you ever read the press release?
>> >
>> ><http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/mi...8644&TICK=CING
>> >UL1&STORY=/www/story/11-16-2004/0002458939&EDATE=Nov+16,+2004>
>> >
>> >Teams of Cingular employees spent Sunday night fully converting 1,055
>> >former AT&T Wireless company-owned stores into Cingular stores.
>>
>> You seem to be the only one who is really concerned about *signs!*
>> Give it up already! Sheesh!
>
>The signs are just a symbol of Cingular's lying. ...
Total nonsense.
--
Best regards,
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/>
"A little learning is a dangerous thing." [Alexander Pope]
"It is better to sit in silence and appear ignorant,
than to open your mouth and remove all doubt." [Mark Twain]
- 02-01-2005, 04:55 AM #20John NavasGuest
Re: Unchanged AT&T WIreless stores to remain?
[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
In <[email protected]> on Sun, 30 Jan
2005 01:47:46 GMT, Jack Zwick <[email protected]> wrote:
>In article <[email protected]>,
> Tropical Haven <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> >>>Teams of Cingular employees spent Sunday night fully converting 1,055
>> >>>former AT&T Wireless company-owned stores into Cingular stores.
>> >>
>> >>You said it yourself -- "1,055 former AT&T Wireless company-owned
>> >>stores", it DID NOT say ALL former AT&T Wireless company-owned stores.
>> >
>> >
>> > Read it. The ones not done were "agent locations", not company stores.
>> > Jeeez
>>
>> That's still not what it said. It basically said agent stores were
>> going to be switching over in the foreseeable future. It still didn't
>> mentional ALL ATTWS corporate stores.
>
>Yes it did,
No it didn't.
>and you know it otherwise you wouldn't have snipped out the
>link.
>
><http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/mi...8644&TICK=CING
>UL1&STORY=/www/story/11-16-2004/0002458939&EDATE=Nov+16,+2004>
Doesn't say what you claim, as has been pointed out to you repeatedly.
--
Best regards,
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/>
"A little learning is a dangerous thing." [Alexander Pope]
"It is better to sit in silence and appear ignorant,
than to open your mouth and remove all doubt." [Mark Twain]
- 02-01-2005, 04:56 AM #21John NavasGuest
Re: Unchanged AT&T WIreless stores to remain?
[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
In <[email protected]> on Sun, 30 Jan
2005 01:46:42 GMT, Jack Zwick <[email protected]> wrote:
>In article <[email protected]>,
> Tropical Haven <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Sorry you can't take 30 seconds to Tiny URL it.
>>
>> Apparently you need to expand beyond long URL posting.
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/
>
>Apparently you need to learn manners.
>
>Many folks refuse to use a tiny url link as they don't know where it may
>lead them, so in deference to that legitimate concern I don't use it.
What a silly excuse. Regardless, you should at least learn how to post them
without wrapping them. LOL
--
Best regards,
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/>
"A little learning is a dangerous thing." [Alexander Pope]
"It is better to sit in silence and appear ignorant,
than to open your mouth and remove all doubt." [Mark Twain]
- 04-20-2005, 04:55 PM #22Kevin KGuest
Re: Unchanged AT&T WIreless stores to remain?
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 11:15:14 +0000, Jack Zwick wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>,
> "JohnF" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Jack, you need to get over this obsession you have with their signs. I'm
>> glad they're worrying about things that matter. Maybe they're still
>> deciding which stores to keep and don't want to sink money in changing
>> signs that they're going to close? Who cares?
>
> Did you ever read the press release?
>
> <http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/mi...8644&TICK=CING
> UL1&STORY=/www/story/11-16-2004/0002458939&EDATE=Nov+16,+2004>
>
> Teams of Cingular employees spent Sunday night fully converting 1,055
> former AT&T Wireless company-owned stores into Cingular stores.
Which, to a reasonable person, would mean that they now have Cingular
phones and displays, remove AT&T literature, etc.
A local Eckerd drug store converted to CVS before November 15th. They
still have a plastic CVS sign partially covering the old Eckerd sign.
Similar Threads
- Verizon
- Verizon
- alt.cellular.verizon
- alt.cellular.sprintpcs
Auto para negocios
in Chit Chat