Results 1 to 7 of 7
- 08-30-2005, 12:47 PM #1John NavasGuest
<http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/4196762.stm>:
Mobile phone use does not up the risk of cancer, at least in the
first 10 years of use, the largest investigation to date shows.
[MORE]
--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>
› See More: NEWS: Mobile phone cancer link rejected
- 08-30-2005, 03:27 PM #2Ivor JonesGuest
Re: NEWS: Mobile phone cancer link rejected
"Brian Morrison" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]
> John Navas wrote:
> > <http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/4196762.stm>:
> >
> > Mobile phone use does not up the risk of cancer, at
> > least in the first 10 years of use, the largest
> > investigation to date shows.
>
> C'mon John, you don't think that's going to stop the
> tin-foil hats brigade do you?
>
>
Think of the chiiiiiiiiilllllllllllldddddddddddren..!!
Ivor
- 08-31-2005, 12:40 PM #3Isaiah BeardGuest
Re: NEWS: Mobile phone cancer link rejected
John Navas wrote:
> <http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/4196762.stm>:
>
> Mobile phone use does not up the risk of cancer, at least in the
> first 10 years of use, the largest investigation to date shows.
Pfft, I could've told you that. My mother has a 7000-minute-per-month
habit. No tumors yet.
--
E-mail fudged to thwart spammers.
Transpose the c's and a's in my e-mail address to reply.
- 08-31-2005, 01:16 PM #4Ivor JonesGuest
Re: NEWS: Mobile phone cancer link rejected
"Isaiah Beard" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]
> John Navas wrote:
> > <http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/4196762.stm>:
> >
> > Mobile phone use does not up the risk of cancer, at
> > least in the first 10 years of use, the largest
> > investigation to date shows.
>
> Pfft, I could've told you that. My mother has a
> 7000-minute-per-month habit. No tumors yet.
7000 minutes..?! That's almost 5 full days continuously, who does she talk
to..?!
Ivor
- 08-31-2005, 01:33 PM #5Howard NeilGuest
Re: NEWS: Mobile phone cancer link rejected
Ivor Jones wrote:
> "Isaiah Beard" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]
>
>>John Navas wrote:
>>
>>><http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/4196762.stm>:
>>>
>>> Mobile phone use does not up the risk of cancer, at
>>> least in the first 10 years of use, the largest
>>>investigation to date shows.
>>
>>Pfft, I could've told you that. My mother has a
>>7000-minute-per-month habit. No tumors yet.
>
>
> 7000 minutes..?! That's almost 5 full days continuously, who does she talk
> to..?!
Her son? :-)
--
Howard Neil
- 08-31-2005, 01:42 PM #6Isaiah BeardGuest
Re: NEWS: Mobile phone cancer link rejected
Ivor Jones wrote:
> 7000 minutes..?! That's almost 5 full days continuously,
Yes, I know. She pushes the envelope on the unlimited off-peak minutes
concept, and has even gone a bit over her 2000 minute anytime bucket
from time to time (she signed up during the Free & Clear 2000
AT/Unlimited N&W @ 7PM/Unlimited PCS2PCS for $100 promotion). Even with
overage, she's managed some months to bring the effective cost of her
total used airtime to about 1.4 cents per minute.
I'm sure Sprint deeply regrets the day that I got my $20 service credit
for referring her.
> who does she talk to..?!
Too many people.
--
E-mail fudged to thwart spammers.
Transpose the c's and a's in my e-mail address to reply.
- 09-01-2005, 05:06 AM #7Isaiah BeardGuest
Re: NEWS: Mobile phone cancer link rejected
Howard Neil wrote:
>>
>> 7000 minutes..?! That's almost 5 full days continuously, who does she
>> talk to..?!
>
>
> Her son? :-)
Noooo, I only use, at most, 400 minutes a month. You know the
cliche: "you never call, you never write..."
--
E-mail fudged to thwart spammers.
Transpose the c's and a's in my e-mail address to reply.
Similar Threads
- General Cell Phone Forum
- New Member Introductions
- General Cell Phone Forum
- General Cell Phone Forum
Aws gpu
in Chit Chat