Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    John Navas
    Guest
    <http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/4196762.stm>:

    Mobile phone use does not up the risk of cancer, at least in the
    first 10 years of use, the largest investigation to date shows.

    [MORE]

    --
    Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
    John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>



    See More: NEWS: Mobile phone cancer link rejected




  2. #2
    Ivor Jones
    Guest

    Re: NEWS: Mobile phone cancer link rejected



    "Brian Morrison" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    > John Navas wrote:
    > > <http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/4196762.stm>:
    > >
    > > Mobile phone use does not up the risk of cancer, at
    > > least in the first 10 years of use, the largest
    > > investigation to date shows.

    >
    > C'mon John, you don't think that's going to stop the
    > tin-foil hats brigade do you?
    >
    >


    Think of the chiiiiiiiiilllllllllllldddddddddddren..!!

    Ivor





  3. #3
    Isaiah Beard
    Guest

    Re: NEWS: Mobile phone cancer link rejected

    John Navas wrote:
    > <http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/4196762.stm>:
    >
    > Mobile phone use does not up the risk of cancer, at least in the
    > first 10 years of use, the largest investigation to date shows.


    Pfft, I could've told you that. My mother has a 7000-minute-per-month
    habit. No tumors yet.

    --
    E-mail fudged to thwart spammers.
    Transpose the c's and a's in my e-mail address to reply.



  4. #4
    Ivor Jones
    Guest

    Re: NEWS: Mobile phone cancer link rejected



    "Isaiah Beard" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    > John Navas wrote:
    > > <http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/4196762.stm>:
    > >
    > > Mobile phone use does not up the risk of cancer, at
    > > least in the first 10 years of use, the largest
    > > investigation to date shows.

    >
    > Pfft, I could've told you that. My mother has a
    > 7000-minute-per-month habit. No tumors yet.


    7000 minutes..?! That's almost 5 full days continuously, who does she talk
    to..?!

    Ivor





  5. #5
    Howard Neil
    Guest

    Re: NEWS: Mobile phone cancer link rejected

    Ivor Jones wrote:
    > "Isaiah Beard" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:[email protected]
    >
    >>John Navas wrote:
    >>
    >>><http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/4196762.stm>:
    >>>
    >>> Mobile phone use does not up the risk of cancer, at
    >>> least in the first 10 years of use, the largest
    >>>investigation to date shows.

    >>
    >>Pfft, I could've told you that. My mother has a
    >>7000-minute-per-month habit. No tumors yet.

    >
    >
    > 7000 minutes..?! That's almost 5 full days continuously, who does she talk
    > to..?!


    Her son? :-)

    --
    Howard Neil



  6. #6
    Isaiah Beard
    Guest

    Re: NEWS: Mobile phone cancer link rejected

    Ivor Jones wrote:

    > 7000 minutes..?! That's almost 5 full days continuously,


    Yes, I know. She pushes the envelope on the unlimited off-peak minutes
    concept, and has even gone a bit over her 2000 minute anytime bucket
    from time to time (she signed up during the Free & Clear 2000
    AT/Unlimited N&W @ 7PM/Unlimited PCS2PCS for $100 promotion). Even with
    overage, she's managed some months to bring the effective cost of her
    total used airtime to about 1.4 cents per minute.

    I'm sure Sprint deeply regrets the day that I got my $20 service credit
    for referring her.

    > who does she talk to..?!


    Too many people.

    --
    E-mail fudged to thwart spammers.
    Transpose the c's and a's in my e-mail address to reply.



  7. #7
    Isaiah Beard
    Guest

    Re: NEWS: Mobile phone cancer link rejected

    Howard Neil wrote:

    >>
    >> 7000 minutes..?! That's almost 5 full days continuously, who does she
    >> talk to..?!

    >
    >
    > Her son? :-)


    Noooo, I only use, at most, 400 minutes a month. You know the
    cliche: "you never call, you never write..."



    --
    E-mail fudged to thwart spammers.
    Transpose the c's and a's in my e-mail address to reply.



  • Similar Threads