TEST ONLY

TEST NLY

---

› See More: TEST ONLY

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.motorola - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <[email protected]> on Sun, 07 Aug 2005 22:02:36 -0400, D
<[email protected]> wrote:

>TEST NLY

Your test failed: Your post showed up here, instead of a test newsgroup.
Your newsreader appears to be posting to the wrong group.

In the future please use a test newsgroup (e.g., alt.test, comp.test,
microsoft.public.test, misc.test, rec.test, regional test newsgroup, test
newsgroup set up by your ISP) -- that's what they are there for, and you'll
get the additional benefit of automatic confirmations by various remote
servers. Thanks for your consideration.

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>

John Navas wrote:
> [POSTED TO alt.cellular.motorola - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>
> In <[email protected]> on Sun, 07 Aug 2005 22:02:36 -0400, D
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>TEST NLY
>
>
> Your test failed: Your post showed up here, instead of a test newsgroup.
> Your newsreader appears to be posting to the wrong group.
>
> In the future please use a test newsgroup (e.g., alt.test, comp.test,
> microsoft.public.test, misc.test, rec.test, regional test newsgroup, test
> newsgroup set up by your ISP) -- that's what they are there for, and you'll
> get the additional benefit of automatic confirmations by various remote
> servers. Thanks for your consideration.
>
No it didn't fail, it wasn't aimed at a test group.

D wrote:
> John Navas wrote:
>
>> [POSTED TO alt.cellular.motorola - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>>
>> In <[email protected]> on Sun, 07 Aug 2005 22:02:36
>> -0400, D
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> TEST NLY
>>
>>
>>
>> Your test failed: Your post showed up here, instead of a test newsgroup.
>> Your newsreader appears to be posting to the wrong group.
>>
>> In the future please use a test newsgroup (e.g., alt.test, comp.test,
>> microsoft.public.test, misc.test, rec.test, regional test newsgroup, test
>> newsgroup set up by your ISP) -- that's what they are there for, and
>> you'll
>> get the additional benefit of automatic confirmations by various remote
>> servers. Thanks for your consideration.
>>
> No it didn't fail, it wasn't aimed at a test group.


Then you test criteria was flawed because it should've been.

--
jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'

Jer wrote:
> D wrote:
>
>> John Navas wrote:
>>
>>> [POSTED TO alt.cellular.motorola - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>>>
>>> In <[email protected]> on Sun, 07 Aug 2005 22:02:36
>>> -0400, D
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> TEST NLY
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Your test failed: Your post showed up here, instead of a test
>>> newsgroup.
>>> Your newsreader appears to be posting to the wrong group.
>>>
>>> In the future please use a test newsgroup (e.g., alt.test, comp.test,
>>> microsoft.public.test, misc.test, rec.test, regional test newsgroup,
>>> test
>>> newsgroup set up by your ISP) -- that's what they are there for, and
>>> you'll
>>> get the additional benefit of automatic confirmations by various remote
>>> servers. Thanks for your consideration.
>>>
>> No it didn't fail, it wasn't aimed at a test group.
>
>
>
> Then you test criteria was flawed because it should've been.
>
No, it wasn't flawed in any way I just wanted to ensure that my post
reached USENET. Worked just fine thanks for your concern.

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.motorola - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <[email protected]> on Tue, 09 Aug 2005 13:35:25 -0400, D
<[email protected]> wrote:

>Jer wrote:
>> D wrote:
>>
>>> John Navas wrote:

>>>> Your test failed: Your post showed up here, instead of a test
>>>> newsgroup.
>>>> Your newsreader appears to be posting to the wrong group.
>>>>
>>>> In the future please use a test newsgroup (e.g., alt.test, comp.test,
>>>> microsoft.public.test, misc.test, rec.test, regional test newsgroup,
>>>> test
>>>> newsgroup set up by your ISP) -- that's what they are there for, and
>>>> you'll
>>>> get the additional benefit of automatic confirmations by various remote
>>>> servers. Thanks for your consideration.
>>>>
>>> No it didn't fail, it wasn't aimed at a test group.
>>
>> Then you test criteria was flawed because it should've been.
>>
>No, it wasn't flawed in any way I just wanted to ensure that my post
>reached USENET. Worked just fine thanks for your concern.

It *was* flawed, not to mention rude. There's no good reason to make a test
post to a discussion newsgroup. Either use a test newsgroup (which is
likewise USENET) or post something relevant. If you don't have anything
relevant to say, then don't post.

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>

John Navas wrote:
> [POSTED TO alt.cellular.motorola - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>
> In <[email protected]> on Tue, 09 Aug 2005 13:35:25 -0400, D
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>Jer wrote:
>>
>>>D wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>John Navas wrote:
>
>
>>>>>Your test failed: Your post showed up here, instead of a test
>>>>>newsgroup.
>>>>>Your newsreader appears to be posting to the wrong group.
>>>>>
>>>>>In the future please use a test newsgroup (e.g., alt.test, comp.test,
>>>>>microsoft.public.test, misc.test, rec.test, regional test newsgroup,
>>>>>test
>>>>>newsgroup set up by your ISP) -- that's what they are there for, and
>>>>>you'll
>>>>>get the additional benefit of automatic confirmations by various remote
>>>>>servers. Thanks for your consideration.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>No it didn't fail, it wasn't aimed at a test group.
>>>
>>>Then you test criteria was flawed because it should've been.
>>>
>>
>>No, it wasn't flawed in any way I just wanted to ensure that my post
>>reached USENET. Worked just fine thanks for your concern.
>
>
> It *was* flawed, not to mention rude. There's no good reason to make a test
> post to a discussion newsgroup. Either use a test newsgroup (which is
> likewise USENET) or post something relevant. If you don't have anything
> relevant to say, then don't post.
>
Yawn! When someone dies and puts YOU in charge of USENET your comments
MAY apply but until then MYOB.

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.motorola - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <[email protected]> on Wed, 10 Aug 2005 13:07:16 -0400, D
<[email protected]> wrote:

>John Navas wrote:

>> It *was* flawed, not to mention rude. There's no good reason to make a test
>> post to a discussion newsgroup. Either use a test newsgroup (which is
>> likewise USENET) or post something relevant. If you don't have anything
>> relevant to say, then don't post.
>>
>Yawn! When someone dies and puts YOU in charge of USENET your comments
>MAY apply but until then MYOB.

Are you are you a jerk by nature, or do you have to work at it?

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>

John Navas wrote:
> [POSTED TO alt.cellular.motorola - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>
> In <[email protected]> on Wed, 10 Aug 2005 13:07:16 -0400, D
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>John Navas wrote:
>
>
>>>It *was* flawed, not to mention rude. There's no good reason to make a test
>>>post to a discussion newsgroup. Either use a test newsgroup (which is
>>>likewise USENET) or post something relevant. If you don't have anything
>>>relevant to say, then don't post.
>>>
>>
>>Yawn! When someone dies and puts YOU in charge of USENET your comments
>>MAY apply but until then MYOB.
>
>
> Are you are you a jerk by nature, or do you have to work at it?
>
I put a lot of effort into it, it doesn't come easy.