NEWS: Cingular Gets Approval for Acquisition Deal as Soon As 2004

Classic argument guys..

Every cell provider sucks somewhere - It's wireless - It will never be 100%

I guess the best guidance is find a provider that works good in your area
and is affordable.

Where I live Nextel is the best coverage but they are just too damn
expensive...Verizon is a close second in coverage but, again, too
expensive..



> You line in an area that is an exception....
>
> In most areas of the country it is the EXACT opposite.
> Example: out west Cingular SUCKS really badly.
> VZW kicks their ass, hands down. NO contest.
>
>
> "Aboutdakota" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>>
>>
>> Roopinder Randhawa wrote:
>>> Most possibly it wil be AT&T as TDMA and GSM are only offered by both these
>>> National companies
>>> Moreover T-Mobile is well funded gtom otherplaces and AT&T is laying off and
>>> degrading service levels.
>>> But Cingular sucks and so does AT&T so I see a bigger suck with them
>>> combined.
>>
>> I've had great luck with Cingular. If you want to see service that
>> sucks, visit the native network of Verizon Wireless in North and South
>> Dakota. Or visit the network of Western Wireless. Or Sprint PCS. I
>> have a GAIT phone from Cingular, and it gets service in more places than
>> a CDMA phone from Verizon.
>>
>> AD
>>
>
>

---

› See More: NEWS: Cingular Gets Approval for Acquisition Deal as Soon As 2004

Classic argument guys..

Every cell provider sucks somewhere - It's wireless - It will never be 100%

I guess the best guidance is find a provider that works good in your area
and is affordable.

Where I live Nextel is the best coverage but they are just too damn
expensive...Verizon is a close second in coverage but, again, too
expensive..



> You line in an area that is an exception....
>
> In most areas of the country it is the EXACT opposite.
> Example: out west Cingular SUCKS really badly.
> VZW kicks their ass, hands down. NO contest.
>
>
> "Aboutdakota" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>>
>>
>> Roopinder Randhawa wrote:
>>> Most possibly it wil be AT&T as TDMA and GSM are only offered by both these
>>> National companies
>>> Moreover T-Mobile is well funded gtom otherplaces and AT&T is laying off and
>>> degrading service levels.
>>> But Cingular sucks and so does AT&T so I see a bigger suck with them
>>> combined.
>>
>> I've had great luck with Cingular. If you want to see service that
>> sucks, visit the native network of Verizon Wireless in North and South
>> Dakota. Or visit the network of Western Wireless. Or Sprint PCS. I
>> have a GAIT phone from Cingular, and it gets service in more places than
>> a CDMA phone from Verizon.
>>
>> AD
>>
>
>

I personally have not seen this rumor anyplace but here, but it does make
sence. About a year or two ago T-Mobile was in talks with Cingular to merge.
Also the way AT&T is going in this area, I don't think they want to be
bought out by anyone. They seem to be moving strong. If I had to make a
guess, I would say it is T-Mobile.

--

Do you think you are spending too much for your long distance? Stop by
http://ld.net/?fjclaus and use our Free "Best Rates for Me" calculator
to find the best company for you.
We have all your telecommunication needs on one site.

"PDA Man" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Is it TMOBILE? Is it ATTWS? This is gonna be FUN!!
>
> Cingular Wireless has gotten approval from its parent companies SBC
> Communications and BellSouth to acquire another leading U.S. carrier. The
> news means Cingular could acquire one of its rivals by as early as next
> year. It has also sparked the latest round of "guess which carriers will
> merge". Insiders are betting that Cingular will make a bid for either AT&T
> Wireless or T-Mobile. T-Mobile's parent, Deutsche Telekom, has denied
recent
> merger rumors, saying it is dedicated to its U.S. operation. Most insiders
> are currently betting on a Cingular/AT&T Wireless merger. Such a move
would
> create a North American GSM carrier with more than 40 million subscribers.
>
> SOURCE : Businessweek Online (Subscription
>
Required)http://lists.fiercemarkets.com/c.htm...d3r5,gvx7,5kmr
> ,bqzq
>
> Visit Wireless World at http://wirelessway.blogspot.com for the latest in
> Wireless Technology News and Info! Free Drawing for Aluminum Palm /Clie
> case!!
>
>
>

I personally have not seen this rumor anyplace but here, but it does make
sence. About a year or two ago T-Mobile was in talks with Cingular to merge.
Also the way AT&T is going in this area, I don't think they want to be
bought out by anyone. They seem to be moving strong. If I had to make a
guess, I would say it is T-Mobile.

--

Do you think you are spending too much for your long distance? Stop by
http://ld.net/?fjclaus and use our Free "Best Rates for Me" calculator
to find the best company for you.
We have all your telecommunication needs on one site.

"PDA Man" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Is it TMOBILE? Is it ATTWS? This is gonna be FUN!!
>
> Cingular Wireless has gotten approval from its parent companies SBC
> Communications and BellSouth to acquire another leading U.S. carrier. The
> news means Cingular could acquire one of its rivals by as early as next
> year. It has also sparked the latest round of "guess which carriers will
> merge". Insiders are betting that Cingular will make a bid for either AT&T
> Wireless or T-Mobile. T-Mobile's parent, Deutsche Telekom, has denied
recent
> merger rumors, saying it is dedicated to its U.S. operation. Most insiders
> are currently betting on a Cingular/AT&T Wireless merger. Such a move
would
> create a North American GSM carrier with more than 40 million subscribers.
>
> SOURCE : Businessweek Online (Subscription
>
Required)http://lists.fiercemarkets.com/c.htm...d3r5,gvx7,5kmr
> ,bqzq
>
> Visit Wireless World at http://wirelessway.blogspot.com for the latest in
> Wireless Technology News and Info! Free Drawing for Aluminum Palm /Clie
> case!!
>
>
>

On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 16:02:06 GMT, "Steven M. Scharf"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>
>"Bill Roland" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:6pCvb.3241$Ac3.784@lakeread01...
>> I just can't see the Fed's allowing an AT&T Wireless/Cingular
>> merger/aquisition.
>
>The feds will do whatever big business wants, as long as there are still at
>least two competitors.
>
The "feds" also broke up AT&T back in '84. They wont allow a merger
between Cingular and AT&T, it would destroy T-Mobile.

On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 16:02:06 GMT, "Steven M. Scharf"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>
>"Bill Roland" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:6pCvb.3241$Ac3.784@lakeread01...
>> I just can't see the Fed's allowing an AT&T Wireless/Cingular
>> merger/aquisition.
>
>The feds will do whatever big business wants, as long as there are still at
>least two competitors.
>
The "feds" also broke up AT&T back in '84. They wont allow a merger
between Cingular and AT&T, it would destroy T-Mobile.

"Steven M. Scharf" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:2MLvb.9439>
> If Cingular acquired AT&T it would clear the way for Verizon to put Sprint
> out of its misery,

Well if Verizon bought SPCS, then it wouldn't get the entire Sprint network
as much of the network outside the biggest markets is not owned by Sprint
but smaller affiliates like Alamosa PCS, Ubiquitel, US Unwired, etc. A SPCS
buyout would kill the smaller guys and millions of folks who used to have
"Sprint" would then have nothing. I don't think Sprint PCS will ever be
part of another company unless some company were to buy both Sprint PCS and
the other Sprint divisions.

"Steven M. Scharf" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:2MLvb.9439>
> If Cingular acquired AT&T it would clear the way for Verizon to put Sprint
> out of its misery,

Well if Verizon bought SPCS, then it wouldn't get the entire Sprint network
as much of the network outside the biggest markets is not owned by Sprint
but smaller affiliates like Alamosa PCS, Ubiquitel, US Unwired, etc. A SPCS
buyout would kill the smaller guys and millions of folks who used to have
"Sprint" would then have nothing. I don't think Sprint PCS will ever be
part of another company unless some company were to buy both Sprint PCS and
the other Sprint divisions.

Aboutdakota wrote:

> Actually, the Verizon/Sprint would be more complicated than one would
> think. Verizon Communications would want to remain in control, but in
> the event of a Verizon Wireless/Sprint PCS merger, if Vodafone acquired
> Sprint PCS to contribute to the venture, it would now have control of
> Verizon Wireless. If that happened, it would probably become Vodafone,
> and a switch to from CDMA2000 1x EV-DO to W-CDMA would probably happen.

Verizon Communications will not give up control of Verizon Wireless.
It won't happen. It is their future growth vehicle. If SprintPCS was
acquired for Verizon Wireless, it would be acquired by Verizon
Wireless partnership, not by Vodafone. Verizon Comm. would not allow
Vodafone to "contribute" anything to the partnership that would give
Vodafone control.

Verizon Communications is quite comfortable with the situation as it
stands, but would be willing to buy out Vodafone, if necessary.
Vodafone is the party that is evidently unhappy with the current
situation. There is nothing they can arbitrarity do to wrest control
from Verizon Communications. If they wish to control a wireless
carrier in the U.S., they will need to divest their 45% of VZW and
pick up a different carrier.

In short, if there is to be a Vodafone Wireless in the U.S., it will
be competing with Verizon Wireless, not replacing it.

Aboutdakota wrote:

> Actually, the Verizon/Sprint would be more complicated than one would
> think. Verizon Communications would want to remain in control, but in
> the event of a Verizon Wireless/Sprint PCS merger, if Vodafone acquired
> Sprint PCS to contribute to the venture, it would now have control of
> Verizon Wireless. If that happened, it would probably become Vodafone,
> and a switch to from CDMA2000 1x EV-DO to W-CDMA would probably happen.

Verizon Communications will not give up control of Verizon Wireless.
It won't happen. It is their future growth vehicle. If SprintPCS was
acquired for Verizon Wireless, it would be acquired by Verizon
Wireless partnership, not by Vodafone. Verizon Comm. would not allow
Vodafone to "contribute" anything to the partnership that would give
Vodafone control.

Verizon Communications is quite comfortable with the situation as it
stands, but would be willing to buy out Vodafone, if necessary.
Vodafone is the party that is evidently unhappy with the current
situation. There is nothing they can arbitrarity do to wrest control
from Verizon Communications. If they wish to control a wireless
carrier in the U.S., they will need to divest their 45% of VZW and
pick up a different carrier.

In short, if there is to be a Vodafone Wireless in the U.S., it will
be competing with Verizon Wireless, not replacing it.

So that's the Verizon company line...


"J on the phone" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Aboutdakota wrote:
>
> > Actually, the Verizon/Sprint would be more complicated than one would
> > think. Verizon Communications would want to remain in control, but in
> > the event of a Verizon Wireless/Sprint PCS merger, if Vodafone acquired
> > Sprint PCS to contribute to the venture, it would now have control of
> > Verizon Wireless. If that happened, it would probably become Vodafone,
> > and a switch to from CDMA2000 1x EV-DO to W-CDMA would probably happen.
>
> Verizon Communications will not give up control of Verizon Wireless.
> It won't happen. It is their future growth vehicle. If SprintPCS was
> acquired for Verizon Wireless, it would be acquired by Verizon
> Wireless partnership, not by Vodafone. Verizon Comm. would not allow
> Vodafone to "contribute" anything to the partnership that would give
> Vodafone control.
>
> Verizon Communications is quite comfortable with the situation as it
> stands, but would be willing to buy out Vodafone, if necessary.
> Vodafone is the party that is evidently unhappy with the current
> situation. There is nothing they can arbitrarity do to wrest control
> from Verizon Communications. If they wish to control a wireless
> carrier in the U.S., they will need to divest their 45% of VZW and
> pick up a different carrier.
>
> In short, if there is to be a Vodafone Wireless in the U.S., it will
> be competing with Verizon Wireless, not replacing it.

So that's the Verizon company line...


"J on the phone" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Aboutdakota wrote:
>
> > Actually, the Verizon/Sprint would be more complicated than one would
> > think. Verizon Communications would want to remain in control, but in
> > the event of a Verizon Wireless/Sprint PCS merger, if Vodafone acquired
> > Sprint PCS to contribute to the venture, it would now have control of
> > Verizon Wireless. If that happened, it would probably become Vodafone,
> > and a switch to from CDMA2000 1x EV-DO to W-CDMA would probably happen.
>
> Verizon Communications will not give up control of Verizon Wireless.
> It won't happen. It is their future growth vehicle. If SprintPCS was
> acquired for Verizon Wireless, it would be acquired by Verizon
> Wireless partnership, not by Vodafone. Verizon Comm. would not allow
> Vodafone to "contribute" anything to the partnership that would give
> Vodafone control.
>
> Verizon Communications is quite comfortable with the situation as it
> stands, but would be willing to buy out Vodafone, if necessary.
> Vodafone is the party that is evidently unhappy with the current
> situation. There is nothing they can arbitrarity do to wrest control
> from Verizon Communications. If they wish to control a wireless
> carrier in the U.S., they will need to divest their 45% of VZW and
> pick up a different carrier.
>
> In short, if there is to be a Vodafone Wireless in the U.S., it will
> be competing with Verizon Wireless, not replacing it.

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <[email protected]> on Sat, 22 Nov 2003
16:02:06 GMT, "Steven M. Scharf" <[email protected]> wrote:

>... AT&T and Sprint are predicted to be the biggest losers from
>number portability.

Funny how you change your tune:

----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Steven M. Scharf" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups: alt.cellular.cingular
Subject: Re: NEWS: Get Ready for a Wireless Carrier War
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2003 06:12:17 GMT

Actually, all the predictions are that Verizon and T-Moble will be
the big winners. I.e. see:

"http://taipeitimes.com/News/bizfocus/archives/2003/08/31/2003066000"

Winners: Verizon and T-Mobile
Losers: Cingular, AT&T Wireless, Sprint PCS, Nextel

This is just one of many similar predictions.

....
----------------------------------------------------------------------

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <[email protected]> on Sat, 22 Nov 2003
16:02:06 GMT, "Steven M. Scharf" <[email protected]> wrote:

>... AT&T and Sprint are predicted to be the biggest losers from
>number portability.

Funny how you change your tune:

----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Steven M. Scharf" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups: alt.cellular.cingular
Subject: Re: NEWS: Get Ready for a Wireless Carrier War
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2003 06:12:17 GMT

Actually, all the predictions are that Verizon and T-Moble will be
the big winners. I.e. see:

"http://taipeitimes.com/News/bizfocus/archives/2003/08/31/2003066000"

Winners: Verizon and T-Mobile
Losers: Cingular, AT&T Wireless, Sprint PCS, Nextel

This is just one of many similar predictions.

....
----------------------------------------------------------------------

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <[email protected]> on Sun, 23 Nov 2003 23:38:31
GMT, "[email protected]" <Michelle Johnson> wrote:

>On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 16:02:06 GMT, "Steven M. Scharf"
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>"Bill Roland" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>news:6pCvb.3241$Ac3.784@lakeread01...
>>> I just can't see the Fed's allowing an AT&T Wireless/Cingular
>>> merger/aquisition.
>>
>>The feds will do whatever big business wants, as long as there are still at
>>least two competitors.
>>
>The "feds" also broke up AT&T back in '84. They wont allow a merger
>between Cingular and AT&T, it would destroy T-Mobile.

The "feds" don't care about T-Mobile -- it's not domestic.

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>