4900 and Vision

If the 4900 is slow and not recommended for Vision, maybe 4900 owners tend not
to use it for Vision, and thats why a Tech might not receive many calls about
it?

> I'd definitely keep it off the bottom.

So which phones would you say the 4900 is better than for Vision usage?

---

› See More: 4900 and Vision

In article <[email protected]>, root@[127.0.0.1]
says...
> I want to know if the newer phones provide more solid laptop
> connections. From someone who had the 4900, got a newer phone, and used
> both with a laptop.

Well, I would of course never admit to having used either my old 4900 or
my new 8100 as a modem, as that's a no-no.

However, hypothetically, if I had done so, I would be able to comment
that the 8100 had less of a tendency to hang or drop the network
connection than did the 4900. However (and hypothetically) I would
also observe that the 8100 doesn't have quite the ability that the 4900
did of holding on to signal in fringe areas.

--
StarOwl

StarOwl wrote:

>> I want to know if the newer phones provide more solid laptop
>> connections. From someone who had the 4900, got a newer phone, and
>> used both with a laptop.

> Well, I would of course never admit to having used either my old 4900
> or my new 8100 as a modem, as that's a no-no.



> However, hypothetically, if I had done so, I would be able to comment
> that the 8100 had less of a tendency to hang or drop the network
> connection than did the 4900. However (and hypothetically) I would
> also observe that the 8100 doesn't have quite the ability that the
> 4900 did of holding on to signal in fringe areas.

*FINALLY* someone answers my question! Thank you!!!


--
da
~~
"OE Quotefix" http://flash.to/oe-quotefix
to fix Outlook Express' broken quoting.