An Open Challenge to Phil (CAT0NHAT, etc.)

To those of you who tire of this subjuect, I would ignore this thread. And
I normally wouldn't go so far off topic in this group, but I've decided to
consolidate all of Phil's rantings into a single post, because I just can't
keep up with the thirty or so active threads in here that he has polluted
with his lack of facts. For those of you who choose to stick around, this
could be entertaining- you may actually get to see someone label themselves
as the fool they really are.

OK Phil- you have ignored any question asked of you, and failed to provide a
shred of backup to your constant whining and crying. So, now the challenge
is made- answer the questions below, and show everybody just how little you
know about everything to do with both Sprint and the wireless industry. By
the way- your answers need to include independent facts, and not your own
meaningless words. And to jog your memory, I'll quote you wherever
possible, although you have failed to address many of these questions in
the past.

1. You have labeled me and many others in this group 'apologists' when we
don't say what you want to hear. I can't speak for the others, but in my
case, show me one quote where I have apologized for the actions of Sprint
specifically, and not talked about them as a part of the entire industry.
Rmember, I have to be talking sepcifically about SPrint- no
generalizations, no industry-wide comments.

Recently, Phil Said:
"Typical Sprint apologist, proven wrong, SprintPCS stock is in the toilet,
and
his reposnse is to insult the messenger and ignore the message."

in response to:

"Do the Wall St. guys know anything about the billing systems, network
technology, individual rate plans, phone technology (not just what is in
the press releases), network expansion plans, fraud programs, network
upgrades, retention programs, 3G technology, technology in development
(again, details, not press releases), or account structures (this list is
just for starters)? Or do they know the window dressing stuff and use that
in conjunction with the financials to do their analysis after the fact?
Did you ever stop to think (oh wait- this is Phil I'm talking to) that
there might be people in the industry (INDUSTRY ANALYSTS) that use the
great big partial list (among other things) I just gave you to determine
the true place a company has in the industry, and uses the financials only
to determine market trends, and not profitability? Last hint, Phil- this
last group of people DO exist, and.......hehehehehehe......they exist in
this group. They don't care about any particular company (translation- not
apologists) as long as the information posted is accurate."



2. You have also stated that I have a 'vested interest' in Sprint. What is
it- you seem to have information if you are making such a bold statement.

This question has gone unanswered.

3. Is it your claim that every cellular company that loses money in a
quarter will go out of business? If so, please show this trend through
articles and analysis.


Recently, Phil said:
"Lets start over. Here is the Reuters story that Sprint apologists try to go
OFF
TOPIC on so it wont be discussed. SprintPCS is losing money, if they keep it
up
they WILL go out of business. "

4. Is it your claim that Wall Street financial analysts know more about
the industry than the industry's own analysts? Do you even acknowledge the
existence of industry analysts? Do you know more than the industry
analysts?

When asked this question, Phil replied:
"The link was already posted, but just for you here it is again:"

5. Is it your claim that stock price alone dictates the survival of
cellular companies?

6. In an industry where the leaders in Customer Satisfaction can't reach
70% satisfaction, is there a big difference between first and last?

7. Why all of the name changes? Afraid people are going to miss your
pearls of wisdom?

This question has never been answered.


8. Only a person with any true experience in the industry would normally
make the claims that you do. What is your experience, other than being a
whiney pain-in-the-arse end user?

This question has never been answered.


I think eight is enough for me (to start). Now Phil, it is easy to ignore a
post to a thread that doesn't have your name in the title. Now you get
your chance to show the world your true knowledge base. And if you choose
to ignore, that will also speak volumes to your utter lack of having a
clue.

To Steven, Tom, Rob and anyone else who has any unanswered questions for
Phil, feel free to jump right in. This may not shut him up, but it is
certainly a chance to show him for what he is.

Oh- I almost forgot. I will be shooting down each of your answers if they
appear to be out of line, and unlike you, I'll bring independent sources to
the table to back myself up.

---

› See More: An Open Challenge to Phil (CAT0NHAT, etc.)

Alas Scott ... I doubt Phillipe has a strong enough soul to answer this
thread. He's a just a troll who gets his jollies from imposing his need to
see his name out there ...


"Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
<snipped>

Bob Smith wrote:

> Alas Scott ... I doubt Phillipe has a strong enough soul to answer this
> thread. He's a just a troll who gets his jollies from imposing his need to
> see his name out there ...
>
>
> "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> <snipped>

I'm in total agreement, Bob. But now he will show his true colors, because
not responding speaks much louder than anything he could ever say.

And this thread answers which newbies question? Go ahead and lie to the people
with dropped calls and tell them to get a PRL update, and itrs all their fault.

You Sprint apologists are amazing.

P.S. Which one of you has bought SprintPCS stock lately?

CAT0NHAT <[email protected]> wrote:
> And this thread answers which newbies question?

It doesn't answer the same questions that your idiotic posts don't answer.

BTW, didn't you have me plonked, liar?

--
JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services
22674 Motnocab Road * Apple Valley, CA 92307-1950
Steve Sobol, Proprietor
888.480.4NET (4638) * 248.724.4NET * [email protected]

"Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> To Steven, Tom, Rob and anyone else who has any unanswered questions for
> Phil, feel free to jump right in. This may not shut him up, but it is
> certainly a chance to show him for what he is.
>

Don't lump me (assuming you are referring to me) in there. I have not had a
question for Phillipe (other than rhetorical) in months. He has been
plonked, plonked and replonked ...

Tom Veldhouse

CAT0NHAT wrote:

> And this thread answers which newbies question? Go ahead and lie to the
> people with dropped calls and tell them to get a PRL update, and itrs all
> their fault.
>
> You Sprint apologists are amazing.
>
> P.S. Which one of you has bought SprintPCS stock lately?

It answers no questions for newbies. It was not intended to, and I have yet
to see a post from you that tells newbies anything. And your inability to
answer the questions in the original post will be forever archived for all
newbies to see (I plan on referencing this thread and your lack of response
frequently in the future). You have now documented your lack of a clue,
and the true lack of depth to your cellular knowledge. Congratulations,
you have just identified yourself as the dictionary definition of a
newsgroup troll for all to see. And all I had to do was ask a few
questions- that was way too easy.

CAT0NHAT wrote:

> And this thread answers which newbies question? Go ahead and lie to the
> people with dropped calls and tell them to get a PRL update, and itrs all
> their fault.
>
> You Sprint apologists are amazing.
>
> P.S. Which one of you has bought SprintPCS stock lately?



It answers no questions for newbies. It was not intended to, and I have yet
to see a post from you that tells newbies anything. And your inability to
answer the questions in the original post will be forever archived for all
newbies to see (I plan on referencing this thread and your lack of response
frequently in the future). You have now documented your lack of a clue,
and the true lack of depth to your cellular knowledge. Congratulations,
you have just identified yourself as the dictionary definition of a
newsgroup troll for all to see. And all I had to do was ask a few
questions- that was way too easy.