Emergency calls only

http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/forums/s...d.php?t=554023

Any people on here also members of DS?

S-Max has posted:

"There will be a signal but on different network. All networks allow
mobile phones to make emergency calls only but no standard calls if the
phone is on a different network."

Would some kind person be able to post the truth, that they won't be
able to make emergency calls and their phones are lying to them, I
wouldn't want someone coming to any harm because they wrongly believe
that they could dial the emergency services when they have no network
coverage of their own.

I would post myself, but DS banned me for pathetic reasons.


--
60 day free DVD rental: www.southeastbirmingham.co.uk/dvd
Mobile Offers: www.southeastbirmingham.co.uk/mob
Items for sale: www.dodgy-dealer.co.uk

---

› See More: Emergency calls only

"{{{{{Welcome}}}}}" <bhx___spam@trapped___hotmail.co.uk>
wrote in message
news:[email protected]
> http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/forums/s...d.php?t=554023
>
> Any people on here also members of DS?
>
> S-Max has posted:
>
> "There will be a signal but on different network. All
> networks allow mobile phones to make emergency calls only
> but no standard calls if the phone is on a different
> network."
> Would some kind person be able to post the truth, that
> they won't be able to make emergency calls and their
> phones are lying to them, I wouldn't want someone coming
> to any harm because they wrongly believe that they could
> dial the emergency services when they have no network
> coverage of their own.
> I would post myself, but DS banned me for pathetic
> reasons.

Sigh...

This has been debated ad nauseum here and elsewhere, most recently here
less than 3 days ago (thread: 999/112 urban myth).

Once and for all, as far as UK networks go, no SIM, no call, emergency or
otherwise. The ability to make emergency calls with no SIM *is* part of
the GSM specifications, but no UK network has chosen to implement it.

End of story.


Ivor

Ivor Jones wrote:
> "{{{{{Welcome}}}}}" <bhx___spam@trapped___hotmail.co.uk>
> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]
>> http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/forums/s...d.php?t=554023
>>
>> Any people on here also members of DS?
>>
>> S-Max has posted:
>>
>> "There will be a signal but on different network. All
>> networks allow mobile phones to make emergency calls only
>> but no standard calls if the phone is on a different
>> network."
>> Would some kind person be able to post the truth, that
>> they won't be able to make emergency calls and their
>> phones are lying to them, I wouldn't want someone coming
>> to any harm because they wrongly believe that they could
>> dial the emergency services when they have no network
>> coverage of their own.
>> I would post myself, but DS banned me for pathetic
>> reasons.
>
> Sigh...
>
> This has been debated ad nauseum here and elsewhere, most recently
> here less than 3 days ago (thread: 999/112 urban myth).
>
> Once and for all, as far as UK networks go, no SIM, no call,
> emergency or otherwise. The ability to make emergency calls with no
> SIM *is* part of the GSM specifications, but no UK network has chosen
> to implement it.
> End of story.
>
>
> Ivor

Exactly my point!

I know all that, that is why I posted and why I wanted someone to post
on DS.

You don't need to sigh or tell me info I know.

But as I can't post to DS, I was hoping some kind soul would, as I don't
want those who read DS to rely on the info.

{{{{{Welcome}}}}} wrote:
> Ivor Jones wrote:
>> "{{{{{Welcome}}}}}" <bhx___spam@trapped___hotmail.co.uk>
>> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]
>>> http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/forums/s...d.php?t=554023
>>>
>>> Any people on here also members of DS?
>>>
>>> S-Max has posted:
>>>
>>> "There will be a signal but on different network. All
>>> networks allow mobile phones to make emergency calls only
>>> but no standard calls if the phone is on a different
>>> network."
>>> Would some kind person be able to post the truth, that
>>> they won't be able to make emergency calls and their
>>> phones are lying to them, I wouldn't want someone coming
>>> to any harm because they wrongly believe that they could
>>> dial the emergency services when they have no network
>>> coverage of their own.
>>> I would post myself, but DS banned me for pathetic
>>> reasons.
>>
>> Sigh...
>>
>> This has been debated ad nauseum here and elsewhere, most recently
>> here less than 3 days ago (thread: 999/112 urban myth).
>>
>> Once and for all, as far as UK networks go, no SIM, no call,
>> emergency or otherwise. The ability to make emergency calls with no
>> SIM *is* part of the GSM specifications, but no UK network has chosen
>> to implement it.
>> End of story.
>>
>>
>> Ivor
>
> Exactly my point!
>
> I know all that, that is why I posted and why I wanted someone to post
> on DS.
>
> You don't need to sigh or tell me info I know.
>
> But as I can't post to DS, I was hoping some kind soul would, as I
> don't want those who read DS to rely on the info.

Should have added for Christ sake to that too.

Posting to me on here is no point, I already know all what you posted,
all I wanted was someone to post that to DS as I can't.

Try reading what I posted first.

I used to have respect for you, but with the way act like a kid when it
comes to Ron and now this, you have lost the respect I had for you.

{{{{{Welcome}}}}} wrote:
> {{{{{Welcome}}}}} wrote:
>> Ivor Jones wrote:
>>> "{{{{{Welcome}}}}}" <bhx___spam@trapped___hotmail.co.uk>
>>> wrote in message
>>> news:[email protected]
>>>> http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/forums/s...d.php?t=554023
>>>>
>>>> Any people on here also members of DS?
>>>>
>>>> S-Max has posted:
>>>>
>>>> "There will be a signal but on different network. All
>>>> networks allow mobile phones to make emergency calls only
>>>> but no standard calls if the phone is on a different
>>>> network."
>>>> Would some kind person be able to post the truth, that
>>>> they won't be able to make emergency calls and their
>>>> phones are lying to them, I wouldn't want someone coming
>>>> to any harm because they wrongly believe that they could
>>>> dial the emergency services when they have no network
>>>> coverage of their own.
>>>> I would post myself, but DS banned me for pathetic
>>>> reasons.
>>>
>>> Sigh...
>>>
>>> This has been debated ad nauseum here and elsewhere, most recently
>>> here less than 3 days ago (thread: 999/112 urban myth).
>>>
>>> Once and for all, as far as UK networks go, no SIM, no call,
>>> emergency or otherwise. The ability to make emergency calls with no
>>> SIM *is* part of the GSM specifications, but no UK network has
>>> chosen to implement it.
>>> End of story.
>>>
>>>
>>> Ivor
>>
>> Exactly my point!
>>
>> I know all that, that is why I posted and why I wanted someone to
>> post on DS.
>>
>> You don't need to sigh or tell me info I know.
>>
>> But as I can't post to DS, I was hoping some kind soul would, as I
>> don't want those who read DS to rely on the info.
>
> Should have added for Christ sake to that too.
>
> Posting to me on here is no point, I already know all what you posted,
> all I wanted was someone to post that to DS as I can't.
>
> Try reading what I posted first.
>
> I used to have respect for you, but with the way act like a kid when
> it comes to Ron and now this, you have lost the respect I had for you.

....and notice that where you could have helped the person in question
(on DS) you haven't just bleated something I already knew and wanted
that info put on DS.

If you couldn't help then why both posting what you did on here when I
already knew that and even posted that in the bloody post!

Ivor Jones wrote:
> "{{{{{Welcome}}}}}" <bhx___spam@trapped___hotmail.co.uk>
> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]
>> http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/forums/s...d.php?t=554023
>>
>> Any people on here also members of DS?
>>
>> S-Max has posted:
>>
>> "There will be a signal but on different network. All
>> networks allow mobile phones to make emergency calls only
>> but no standard calls if the phone is on a different
>> network."
>> Would some kind person be able to post the truth, that
>> they won't be able to make emergency calls and their
>> phones are lying to them, I wouldn't want someone coming
>> to any harm because they wrongly believe that they could
>> dial the emergency services when they have no network
>> coverage of their own.
>> I would post myself, but DS banned me for pathetic
>> reasons.
>
> Sigh...
>

DON'T SIGH AT ME!


> This has been debated ad nauseum here and elsewhere, most recently
> here less than 3 days ago (thread: 999/112 urban myth).
>

YES I KNOW

READ THE ****ING POST I WROTE YOU NUMBSKULL DIP-****


NO WONDER RON THINKS YOU ARE A PRICK


> Once and for all, as far as UK networks go, no SIM, no call,
> emergency or otherwise. The ability to make emergency calls with no
> SIM *is* part of the GSM specifications, but no UK network has chosen
> to implement it.

WHY TELL ME THIS, I HAD ALREADY SAID WHAT WAS POSTED WAS INCORRECT.

I JUST WANTED SOME KIND PERSON TO INFORM THOSE ON DS THIS.

> End of story.
>

FOR YOU MAYBE DIP****

READ THE ****ING POST I WROTE NEXT TIME

>
> Ivor

TELL THAT TO THE PEOPLE ON DS

NOT ME!

I KNOW THAT, THAT WAS WHY I ASKED SOMEONE TO INFORM THE PERSON ON DS

IF YOU READ MY POST YOU WOULD HAVE SEEN THAT.

IF YOU HAD READ MY POST YOU WOULD KNOW I KNEW ALL THAT

IF YOU HAD READ MY POST YOU COULD HAVE POSTED ON DS WHERE THE PERSON WHO
IS DISHING OUT INCORRECT INFO WOULD SEE IT.

NO POINT ON HERE AS THE POST WAS ON DS

SO WHY BOTHER POSTING WHAT I KNEW ALREADY ON HERE, WHEN I ASKED FOR A
KIND SOUL TO POST IT TO DS BECAUSE I CAN'T

BUT NO YOU COULDN'T DO THAT COULD YOU, NOT VERY HELPFUL ARE YOU, ALL YOU
DID WAS POST WHAT I HAD ALREADY SAID.

POINTLESS

Ivor Jones wrote:
> "{{{{{Welcome}}}}}" <bhx___spam@trapped___hotmail.co.uk>
> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]
>> http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/forums/s...d.php?t=554023
>>
>> Any people on here also members of DS?
>>
>> S-Max has posted:
>>
>> "There will be a signal but on different network. All
>> networks allow mobile phones to make emergency calls only
>> but no standard calls if the phone is on a different
>> network."
>> Would some kind person be able to post the truth, that
>> they won't be able to make emergency calls and their
>> phones are lying to them, I wouldn't want someone coming
>> to any harm because they wrongly believe that they could
>> dial the emergency services when they have no network
>> coverage of their own.
>> I would post myself, but DS banned me for pathetic
>> reasons.
>
> Sigh...
>
> This has been debated ad nauseum here and elsewhere, most recently
> here less than 3 days ago (thread: 999/112 urban myth).
>
> Once and for all, as far as UK networks go, no SIM, no call,
> emergency or otherwise. The ability to make emergency calls with no
> SIM *is* part of the GSM specifications, but no UK network has chosen
> to implement it.
> End of story.
>
>
> Ivor

If you can't even be helpful then just go away.

You make out I didn't know any of that you posted, the fact is I KNOW
ALL THAT.

It was that I wanted someone to post to DS, because I can't

UNDERSTAND

Or do you need it put more simply for you?

Ivor Jones wrote:
> "{{{{{Welcome}}}}}" <bhx___spam@trapped___hotmail.co.uk>
> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]
>> http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/forums/s...d.php?t=554023
>>
>> Any people on here also members of DS?
>>
>> S-Max has posted:
>>
>> "There will be a signal but on different network. All
>> networks allow mobile phones to make emergency calls only
>> but no standard calls if the phone is on a different
>> network."


READ THIS BIT HERE

AS YOU SEEM TO BE HARD OF READING

>> Would some kind person be able to post the truth, that
>> they won't be able to make emergency calls and their
>> phones are lying to them, I wouldn't want someone coming
>> to any harm because they wrongly believe that they could
>> dial the emergency services when they have no network
>> coverage of their own.

YOU CAN SEE THERE WAS NO NEED FOR YOUR BLEATING, I HAD ALREADY SAID
THAT!

>> I would post myself, but DS banned me for pathetic
>> reasons.
>

> Sigh...

Don't sigh at me, just read the ****ing post moron.



>
> This has been debated ad nauseum here and elsewhere, most recently
> here less than 3 days ago (thread: 999/112 urban myth).

YES IT HAS ON HERE

READ MY ****ING POST

>
> Once and for all, as far as UK networks go, no SIM, no call,
> emergency or otherwise. The ability to make emergency calls with no
> SIM *is* part of the GSM specifications, but no UK network has chosen
> to implement it.

YES I KNOW ALL THAT

READ MY ****ING POST

> End of story.
>

TELL THAT TO THOSE ON DS, IT WAS THOSE ON THERE I WANTED SOMEONE TO HELP

BUT SEE YOU COULDN'T BE BOTHERED - ALL YOU WANTED TO DO WAS REPEAT WHAT
I HAD SAID


>
> Ivor - idiot.

Ivor Jones wrote:
> "{{{{{Welcome}}}}}" <bhx___spam@trapped___hotmail.co.uk>
> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]
>> http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/forums/s...d.php?t=554023
>>
>> Any people on here also members of DS?
>>
>> S-Max has posted:
>>
>> "There will be a signal but on different network. All
>> networks allow mobile phones to make emergency calls only
>> but no standard calls if the phone is on a different
>> network."
>> Would some kind person be able to post the truth, that
>> they won't be able to make emergency calls and their
>> phones are lying to them, I wouldn't want someone coming
>> to any harm because they wrongly believe that they could
>> dial the emergency services when they have no network
>> coverage of their own.
>> I would post myself, but DS banned me for pathetic
>> reasons.
>
> Sigh...
>
> Ivor

I used to respect you and your opinion, but this has just proven Ron is
right, you are a fool.

andy wrote:
> On Mar 22, 2:12 am, "{{{{{Welcome}}}}}"
> <bhx___spam@trapped___hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>>> I would post myself, but DS banned me for pathetic
>>>> reasons.
>>
>
> After your detailed explanations, I think we understand that



I was banned because someone else who had previously had my IP address
had been banned, and I don't have time to mess about going through
various proxies or leaving my connection off for over a day, just hoping
the IP will change when I switch back on.

Just sometimes when I've had little sleep fool really do annoy me.

{{{{{Welcome}}}}} wrote:
> andy wrote:
>> On Mar 22, 2:12 am, "{{{{{Welcome}}}}}"
>> <bhx___spam@trapped___hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> I would post myself, but DS banned me for pathetic
>>>>> reasons.
>>>
>>
>> After your detailed explanations, I think we understand that
>
>
>
> I was banned because someone else who had previously had my IP address
> had been banned, and I don't have time to mess about going through
> various proxies or leaving my connection off for over a day, just
> hoping the IP will change when I switch back on.
>
> Just sometimes when I've had little sleep fool really do annoy me.

I'd just like to apologise to anyone else, it's just lack of sleep for
the last few days me this really get my back up quickly.

{{{{{Welcome}}}}} wrote:
> {{{{{Welcome}}}}} wrote:
>> andy wrote:
>>> On Mar 22, 2:12 am, "{{{{{Welcome}}}}}"
>>> <bhx___spam@trapped___hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> I would post myself, but DS banned me for pathetic
>>>>>> reasons.
>>>>
>>>
>>> After your detailed explanations, I think we understand that
>>
>>
>>
>> I was banned because someone else who had previously had my IP
>> address had been banned, and I don't have time to mess about going
>> through various proxies or leaving my connection off for over a day,
>> just hoping the IP will change when I switch back on.
>>
>> Just sometimes when I've had little sleep fool really do annoy me.
>
> I'd just like to apologise to anyone else, it's just lack of sleep for
> the last few days me this really get my back up quickly.


....and I still see no one has been kind enough to post the correct info
on DS, says it all really!

"{{{{{Welcome}}}}}" <bhx___spam@trapped___hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

After all your ranting we can at least see why DS banned you.

Jack Torrence wrote:
> "{{{{{Welcome}}}}}" <bhx___spam@trapped___hotmail.co.uk> wrote in
> message news:[email protected]...
>
> After all your ranting we can at least see why DS banned you.

You'd be very very wrong.

"{{{{{Welcome}}}}}" <bhx___spam@trapped___hotmail.co.uk>
wrote in message
news:[email protected]

[snip]

> If you can't even be helpful then just go away.
>
> You make out I didn't know any of that you posted, the
> fact is I KNOW ALL THAT.
>
> It was that I wanted someone to post to DS, because I
> can't
> UNDERSTAND

Sorry, it was not clear to me that you wanted someone to post elsewhere
for you, I misunderstood. Having re-read your message I now see what you
meant, but IMHO you should have put the fact that you wanted someone to
post elsewhere at the start and separated from the main body of the
message.

> Or do you need it put more simply for you?

No need to shout or be offensive, I have apologised, unlike some who post
here.

Ivor