1. #1
    Johnny \HitMan\ Alto
    Guest
    Huh...are they?





    See More: T-Mobile are they any good?




  2. #2
    Bernard Farquart
    Guest

    Re: T-Mobile are they any good?


    "Johnny "HitMan" Alto" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    > Huh...are they?
    >

    Why don't you ask a t-mobile group?
    duh





  3. #3
    BZP
    Guest

    Re: T-Mobile are they any good?


    "Johnny "HitMan" Alto" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    > Huh...are they?


    Head to head: Cingular GSM vs T-Mobile GSM? Nope. They're no longer any good
    since Cingular is now well into GSM rollout.





  4. #4
    Joseph
    Guest

    Re: T-Mobile are they any good?

    On Sun, 4 Apr 2004 23:52:24 -0400, "Johnny \"HitMan\" Alto"
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    >Huh...are they?


    They are terrible. For other opinions you might try the AT&T forum.

    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    remove NONO from .NONOcom to reply



  5. #5
    Plumb Bob
    Guest

    Re: T-Mobile are they any good?


    "Joseph" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    > On Mon, 05 Apr 2004 05:32:23 GMT, "BZP" <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    > >
    > >"Johnny "HitMan" Alto" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > >news:[email protected]
    > >> Huh...are they?

    > >
    > >Head to head: Cingular GSM vs T-Mobile GSM? Nope. They're no longer any

    good
    > >since Cingular is now well into GSM rollout.

    >
    > Which doesn't mean a thing for everyone. If you don't know you should
    > know that what works for one person may not necessarily work well for
    > another.


    Nope. He's got a point but did not explain: Cingular coverage is now far
    better than T-Mobile. Most GSM users would be better off with Cingular.





  6. #6
    Eddie Haskel
    Guest

    Re: T-Mobile are they any good?

    In California...T-mobile subscribers are Roaming on Cingular...as T-Mobile
    HAS NO LICENSES in California..Eddie

    "Johnny "HitMan" Alto" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    > Huh...are they?
    >
    >






  7. #7
    Joseph
    Guest

    Re: T-Mobile are they any good?

    On Mon, 05 Apr 2004 23:28:58 GMT, "Plumb Bob" <[email protected]> wrote:

    >
    >"Joseph" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    >news:[email protected]
    >> On Mon, 05 Apr 2004 05:32:23 GMT, "BZP" <[email protected]> wrote:
    >>
    >> >
    >> >"Johnny "HitMan" Alto" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    >> >news:[email protected]
    >> >> Huh...are they?
    >> >
    >> >Head to head: Cingular GSM vs T-Mobile GSM? Nope. They're no longer any

    >good
    >> >since Cingular is now well into GSM rollout.

    >>
    >> Which doesn't mean a thing for everyone. If you don't know you should
    >> know that what works for one person may not necessarily work well for
    >> another.

    >
    >Nope. He's got a point but did not explain: Cingular coverage is now far
    >better than T-Mobile. Most GSM users would be better off with Cingular.


    You evidently decided to ignore what I said in my message. I'll say
    it again and it still applies. You get what works for you. Did you
    get it that time? As it so happens cingular GSM in Seattle is far
    worse than either T-Mobile or ATTWS. Coverage with cingular is akin
    to Swiss Cheese. Blanket statements don't tend to work for everyone.
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    remove NONO from .NONOcom to reply



  8. #8
    Bernard Farquart
    Guest

    Re: T-Mobile are they any good?


    "Joseph" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    > On Mon, 05 Apr 2004 23:28:58 GMT, "Plumb Bob" <[email protected]> wrote:
    >



    > You evidently decided to ignore what I said in my message. I'll say
    > it again and it still applies. You get what works for you. Did you
    > get it that time? As it so happens cingular GSM in Seattle is far
    > worse than either T-Mobile or ATTWS. Coverage with cingular is akin
    > to Swiss Cheese.


    What part of Seattle? the only bad spots I've seen were in the Rainer
    valley, and a couple of holes in west Seattle. I've done well in
    Ballard, Fremont, downtown, cap hill and the whole north end.





  9. #9
    Joseph
    Guest

    Re: T-Mobile are they any good?

    On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 07:21:04 GMT, "Bernard Farquart"
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    >
    >"Joseph" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    >news:[email protected]
    >> On Mon, 05 Apr 2004 23:28:58 GMT, "Plumb Bob" <[email protected]> wrote:
    >>

    >
    >
    >> You evidently decided to ignore what I said in my message. I'll say
    >> it again and it still applies. You get what works for you. Did you
    >> get it that time? As it so happens cingular GSM in Seattle is far
    >> worse than either T-Mobile or ATTWS. Coverage with cingular is akin
    >> to Swiss Cheese.

    >
    >What part of Seattle? the only bad spots I've seen were in the Rainer
    >valley, and a couple of holes in west Seattle. I've done well in
    >Ballard, Fremont, downtown, cap hill and the whole north end.


    You just confirmed what I said again! What works for one may not work
    for all. Wireless telephony is basically radio waves. If the radio
    waves don't propagate well to an area you'll have problems. It
    doesn't matter whether it's AT&T, cingular, Verizon or T-Mobile. All
    the NIMBYs who hinder base station expansion don't help the situation
    either. I know someone on Beacon Hill who gets marginal reception. A
    wireless company wanted to have City Light replace a poll with an
    extra tall one with mobile antennas on the taller pole. The neighbors
    went into a tizzy claiming everything including the poor indigenous
    critters would be harmed, etc. when it was all about their perception
    that their property values would be harmed. When the wireless company
    instead decided that they'd mount the mobile antennas on a high
    tension transmission tower nearby they also went into fits even though
    the electromagnetic radiation from the transmission lines was far
    greater than anything that would be transmitted from the mobile
    installation.
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    remove NONO from .NONOcom to reply



  10. #10
    Josh III
    Guest

    Re: T-Mobile are they any good?

    I don't know who the carrier is that has one of those high voltage tower top
    installations here near Clemson, SC, but its amazing to me that even works
    at all with the the electric and magnetic fields there already.

    Do they turn the power off when installing the antenna array above the high
    voltage lines?

    I'm sure they don't turn power off when the antennas get serviced now.
    Those cellphone tower companies and climbers earn their pay!

    joshiii
    upstate south carolina




    "Joseph" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    > <snip>
    > When the wireless company
    > instead decided that they'd mount the mobile antennas on a high
    > tension transmission tower nearby they also went into fits even though
    > the electromagnetic radiation from the transmission lines was far
    > greater than anything that would be transmitted from the mobile
    > installation.






  11. #11
    gunitchic625
    gunitchic625 is offline
    Junior Member

    Posts
    9 - liked 1 times

    dey iight

    t-mobile is ok, i noticed on my bill dey put alot of things on there that i never did, they screwed me over a couple times, but they also have some advantages to them too



  12. #12
    jaicam
    jaicam is offline
    Sr. Member

    Location
    there's no place like home- new york, NY!
    Posts
    127

    T-mobile is the best!
    i'm the best kept yet~ the only rapper without a deal that dress fresher than kanye west!



  13. #13
    Vidguy11
    Vidguy11 is offline
    Phone Expert
    Vidguy11's Avatar

    Location
    Why are you interested?
    Posts
    1,049 - liked 35 times

    t-mobile acquired all of cingulars california liscences, and t-mobile has by far the most advanced gsm network since heyve had it for seven years, whereas cinglar has had it for a few months with att. Cingular bought out att because they needed the expanded coverage and because of the tight agreements they had with att.
    Still, like someone said before, it depends on what works for you, not just a general statement on whos better
    a.k.a - Kinjutsu11

    My statements and views are exactly that, my own, they do not reflect the views or statements from T-Mobile or any company i talk about.

    ----T-Mobile - Blackberry - Ringtone - AT&T - Cingular - Nokia EX-Mod ----

    My sites -
    MMF Ringtones (phone browser only) - tagtag.com/kinjutsu - no longer updated, Still active!
    MP3 Ringtones (with Tooldef6) - geocities.com/dj_mystik2001Down indefinitely I need to get back into my CPF flow again before i relaunch it!



  14. #14
    grokdesigns
    grokdesigns is offline
    Newbie

    Posts
    5

    I love T-Mobile!



  • Similar Threads







  • Quick Reply Quick Reply

    If you are already a member, please login above.