Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 26
  1. #1
    Rob
    Guest
    I recently got the N91 on a vodafone contract and was wondering if
    anyone else suffered the same problems as me:

    - Photo gallery takes several minutes to open, even when it's empty?!

    - Phone takes upto a minute to switch on

    - Phone freezes, seems to be random, whether its answeing calls or
    opening a menu it will just crash and then the only way to reset it is
    by removing the battery.

    - Battery life, incredible! How did they get away with those battery
    life figures when I can only get a day's use out of mine and thats on
    standby with full network coverage.

    - Wireless LAN, can only be used to surf the net? I could not find a
    way to transfer any files so its useless IMO.


    Needless to say I returned the phone and got a sony ericsson, never
    again will I buy a Nokia after this phone.




    See More: Nokia N91, why?




  2. #2
    Moonshine
    Guest

    Re: Nokia N91, why?

    On 9 Aug 2006 04:38:03 -0700, "Rob" <[email protected]> wrote:

    >I recently got the N91 on a vodafone contract and was wondering if
    >anyone else suffered the same problems as me:
    >
    >- Photo gallery takes several minutes to open, even when it's empty?!
    >
    >- Phone takes upto a minute to switch on
    >
    >- Phone freezes, seems to be random, whether its answeing calls or
    >opening a menu it will just crash and then the only way to reset it is
    >by removing the battery.
    >
    >- Battery life, incredible! How did they get away with those battery
    >life figures when I can only get a day's use out of mine and thats on
    >standby with full network coverage.
    >
    >- Wireless LAN, can only be used to surf the net? I could not find a
    >way to transfer any files so its useless IMO.
    >
    >
    >Needless to say I returned the phone and got a sony ericsson, never
    >again will I buy a Nokia after this phone.


    Your experience of the N91 is similar to mine with the N70. What a
    pile of xxxx. I hadn't had a Nokia for ages and was not at all
    impressed by this symbian phone. Mine went straight back - first time
    I'd returned a phone.

    Like wise I now have the SE K800i - which is not without its faults
    but is superior in every way to the N70.



  3. #3
    Bobbo
    Guest

    Re: Nokia N91, why?


    Moonshine wrote:

    > Your experience of the N91 is similar to mine with the N70.


    I was hoping this new N-range would bring Nokia back up to their good
    old days, but when I tried an N70 I was disappointed. The -- quite
    frankly, shocking -- delay between me asking it to create a new text
    message [using the right-hand shortcut key under the screen] and it
    actually doing it, put me off considering any of the range.




  4. #4
    Robert
    Guest

    Re: Nokia N91, why?

    "Bobbo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    >
    > Moonshine wrote:
    >
    >> Your experience of the N91 is similar to mine with the N70.

    >
    > I was hoping this new N-range would bring Nokia back up to their good
    > old days, but when I tried an N70 I was disappointed. The -- quite
    > frankly, shocking -- delay between me asking it to create a new text
    > message [using the right-hand shortcut key under the screen] and it
    > actually doing it, put me off considering any of the range.


    Nokia use old technological component circuitary in their products, to save
    cash. As you'll have noticed, the k800i is much better as an all-rounder.
    Shame it's not symbian, but hey.





  5. #5
    PajaP
    Guest

    Re: Nokia N91, why?

    On 9 Aug 2006 04:38:03 -0700, "Rob" <[email protected]> wrote:

    >I recently got the N91 on a vodafone contract and was wondering if
    >anyone else suffered the same problems as me:
    >


    I have it on Vodafone too.

    >- Photo gallery takes several minutes to open, even when it's empty?!
    >


    Yep but after it has built the indexes (first time gallery is run) it
    opens the gallery quickly.

    >- Phone takes upto a minute to switch on
    >


    Yes. Guess it has lots to load. Simple answer, don't turn it off.

    >- Phone freezes, seems to be random, whether its answeing calls or
    >opening a menu it will just crash and then the only way to reset it is
    >by removing the battery.
    >


    Never had mine freeze. Rebooted itself a couple of times though.
    No problems at all since I updated firmware (nokia service centre).
    Proper Nokia firmware. Vodafone crap removed.

    >- Battery life, incredible! How did they get away with those battery
    >life figures when I can only get a day's use out of mine and thats on
    >standby with full network coverage.
    >


    Yes. I have 2 spare batteries.
    I get a couple of days at least out of a battery if I just use it as a
    phone. Music, email web browsing etc use up power.

    >- Wireless LAN, can only be used to surf the net? I could not find a
    >way to transfer any files so its useless IMO.
    >


    Cable is best to transfer files. More than happy with transfer rates
    and I use it daily at work (to replace usb flash drive).

    >
    >Needless to say I returned the phone and got a sony ericsson, never
    >again will I buy a Nokia after this phone.


    I am happy with mine. Maybe you should have tried getting a firmware
    update first.
    N91. The best mobile music device there is.

    --
    PajaP



  6. #6
    Mizter T
    Guest

    Re: Nokia N91, why?

    PajaP wrote:

    > >- Phone freezes, seems to be random, whether its answeing calls or
    > >opening a menu it will just crash and then the only way to reset it is
    > >by removing the battery.
    > >

    >
    > Never had mine freeze. Rebooted itself a couple of times though.
    > No problems at all since I updated firmware (nokia service centre).
    > Proper Nokia firmware. Vodafone crap removed.


    Why oh why do operators insist on adding their own buggy softare to the
    mix. OK, so they want to brand the phone. I don't own an N91 and don't
    have experience of its software, but I guess they also want to give the
    user an incentive to use their handset for data transfer over the
    network as well.

    However the best incentive to do anything like this is to have a
    handset that doesn't screw up. If operators really want to add software
    it should be as perfect as possible. But they won't manage anything
    like that so they should stick to adding branded wallpaper and some
    splash screens for diaplay on power on/off and leave the software to
    the handset manufacturer. Not of course that they can necessarily get
    things right either, but I give them a better chance of so doing.




  7. #7
    gort
    Guest

    Re: Nokia N91, why?


    > Nokia use old technological component circuitary in their products,


    Proof and sources ?

    Dave



  8. #8
    PajaP
    Guest

    Re: Nokia N91, why?

    On 9 Aug 2006 17:43:12 -0700, "Mizter T" <[email protected]> wrote:

    >Why oh why do operators insist on adding their own buggy softare to the
    >mix. OK, so they want to brand the phone. I don't own an N91 and don't
    >have experience of its software, but I guess they also want to give the
    >user an incentive to use their handset for data transfer over the
    >network as well.
    >


    In fairness, the software on the N91 more amounts to a bit of branding
    and all the Vodafone Live stuff. Most of the branding is easy enough
    to remove manually.
    Not anywhere near as bad as Orange when they used to use the 'Home
    Screen' and not allow it to be turned off. I believe they have stopped
    this practice now?

    >However the best incentive to do anything like this is to have a
    >handset that doesn't screw up. If operators really want to add software
    >it should be as perfect as possible. But they won't manage anything
    >like that so they should stick to adding branded wallpaper and some
    >splash screens for diaplay on power on/off and leave the software to
    >the handset manufacturer. Not of course that they can necessarily get
    >things right either, but I give them a better chance of so doing.


    I would have thought that the handset manufacturers do design the
    software on behalf of the Operator?
    It does seem to introduce more possibilities of the phone screwing up
    though.

    More annoying on the Vodafone N91 is the external branding.
    I wish there was a way to remove this without damaging the case.
    I am considering trying some paint stripper on it.

    --
    PajaP



  9. #9
    Schtop!
    Guest

    Re: Nokia N91, why?


    >
    > >- Phone takes upto a minute to switch on


    > Yes. Guess it has lots to load. Simple answer, don't turn it off.


    I think your missing the point. What with the battery life being so
    rubbish sometimes you have to turn it off to save juice!
    >
    > >- Phone freezes, seems to be random, whether its answeing calls or
    > >opening a menu it will just crash and then the only way to reset it is
    > >by removing the battery.
    > >

    >
    > Never had mine freeze. Rebooted itself a couple of times though.
    > No problems at all since I updated firmware (nokia service centre).
    > Proper Nokia firmware. Vodafone crap removed.


    So you have to go to the trouble of updating your firmware in a Nokia
    service center? Do you not think that the phone should work from when
    you get it? Well done for finding a service center btw...
    >
    > >- Battery life, incredible! How did they get away with those battery
    > >life figures when I can only get a day's use out of mine and thats on
    > >standby with full network coverage.
    > >

    >
    > Yes. I have 2 spare batteries.
    > I get a couple of days at least out of a battery if I just use it as a
    > phone. Music, email web browsing etc use up power.


    Why should you need to buy another battery though?

    > >- Wireless LAN, can only be used to surf the net? I could not find a
    > >way to transfer any files so its useless IMO.


    > Cable is best to transfer files. More than happy with transfer rates
    > and I use it daily at work (to replace usb flash drive).


    Not really dealing with the crappy Wireless issue though huh?

    > >Needless to say I returned the phone and got a sony ericsson, never
    > >again will I buy a Nokia after this phone.


    > I am happy with mine. Maybe you should have tried getting a firmware
    > update first.
    > N91. The best mobile music device there is.


    Bollox! As a music device the Nokia's don't hold a candle to either the
    SE Walkman range or the Motorola Rokr and V3's.

    Nokia have lost it. Nothing works and they don't care about their
    customers. Long live Sony Ericsson!




  10. #10
    PajaP
    Guest

    Re: Nokia N91, why?

    On 10 Aug 2006 01:25:35 -0700, "Schtop!" <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    >I think your missing the point. What with the battery life being so
    >rubbish sometimes you have to turn it off to save juice!


    Not missing the point at all. Turn it off and wait for it to switch on
    or don't turn it off and recharge it. 30-60 seconds to boot. Not
    exactly an age is it?

    >So you have to go to the trouble of updating your firmware in a Nokia
    >service center? Do you not think that the phone should work from when
    >you get it? Well done for finding a service center btw...


    It is no trouble to update the firmware and the phone did work from
    when I got it.
    I also updated the firmware on my PC motherboard, DVD drive and video
    card. Updated the firmware in my digital camera. Same for my KISS
    network DivX player, my Laptop, printer and set-top box. The list
    could go on.
    I regularly update the software on my computer along with the hardware
    drivers. The list could go on.
    Service centres are easy to find. Nokia list them on their site.
    It is free to update if the phone has a problem. If you have no
    problem there is nothing to stop you saying there is one.

    >> Yes. I have 2 spare batteries.
    >> I get a couple of days at least out of a battery if I just use it as a
    >> phone. Music, email web browsing etc use up power.

    >
    >Why should you need to buy another battery though?
    >


    I have a spare battery for all my phones, not just my N91.
    I have a spare battery for my digital camera, camcorder and laptop.

    >> Cable is best to transfer files. More than happy with transfer rates
    >> and I use it daily at work (to replace usb flash drive).

    >
    >Not really dealing with the crappy Wireless issue though huh?
    >


    IMO all wireless is crap. What is on the N91 is a good implementation
    of a crap system. They do not advertise it as supporting wireless file
    sharing. If I chose to use it for its intended purpose, wireless
    access to the web and email, it works as it should.

    >> N91. The best mobile music device there is.

    >
    >Bollox! As a music device the Nokia's don't hold a candle to either the
    >SE Walkman range or the Motorola Rokr and V3's.
    >


    That is your opinion. Most review sites tend to disagree with you.
    What file types do the SE Walkman etc support? As many as the N91?
    Do they have a proprietary audio jack?
    Standard usb/connectivity leads for transferring files?

    --
    PajaP



  11. #11
    Bobbo
    Guest

    Re: Nokia N91, why?

    PajaP wrote:

    > On 10 Aug 2006 01:25:35 -0700, "Schtop!" <[email protected]>
    > wrote:
    >
    > It is no trouble to update the firmware and the phone did work from
    > when I got it.
    > I also updated the firmware on my PC motherboard, DVD drive and video
    > card. Updated the firmware in my digital camera. Same for my KISS
    > network DivX player, my Laptop, printer and set-top box. The list
    > could go on.
    > I regularly update the software on my computer along with the hardware
    > drivers. The list could go on.


    I had this issue with my 6600. I'm hardly a power user -- I make
    calls, I take pictures, I send and receive SMS/MMS and that's about it
    -- but found that it crashed every now and again. My friend said his
    did that but stopped when he upgraded the firmware, but I shouldn't
    have to do this for a highly consumer orientated device like a mobile
    phone to just work normally. This is the result of a combination of
    poor engineering and poor testing.

    I've never had to update the firmware on my motherboard, digital
    camera, printer, Gene Simmons, etc. So there seems to be two
    categories of device out there:
    1. Things you have to update just to make them work properly
    2. Things that just work

    > I have a spare battery for all my phones, not just my N91.


    I don't believe you should have to carry spare batteries for modern
    mobile phones - a colleague of mine has Treo and the battery lasts
    about 10 days.

    > IMO all wireless is crap. What is on the N91 is a good implementation
    > of a crap system. They do not advertise it as supporting wireless file
    > sharing. If I chose to use it for its intended purpose, wireless
    > access to the web and email, it works as it should.


    Whether or not you are a wireless fan, it's a reasonably established
    technology and devices which advertise that they support it should
    behave in a certain way, i.e. exactly the same as if you'd plugged a
    wire into them. When I got my laptop out of its box, it spotted that I
    had a wireless network and asked me the password, then after that it
    worked like you'd expect any networked device to work.




  12. #12
    PajaP
    Guest

    Re: Nokia N91, why?

    On 11 Aug 2006 02:01:45 -0700, "Bobbo" <[email protected]> wrote:

    >I've never had to update the firmware on my motherboard, digital
    >camera, printer, Gene Simmons, etc.


    Then you are missing out on bug fixes and new features because they
    _will_ have firmware updates available for them.

    >> I have a spare battery for all my phones, not just my N91.

    >
    >I don't believe you should have to carry spare batteries for modern
    >mobile phones - a colleague of mine has Treo and the battery lasts
    >about 10 days.
    >


    Well by your definition Treo's are "Things you have to update just to
    make them work properly" and you "shouldn't have to do this for a
    highly consumer orientated device like a mobile phone to just work
    normally".

    Like _all_ mobile phones they have bugs that are fixed by updating the
    firmware.

    http://mytreo.net/treofaq/FirmwareIntro

    --
    PajaP



  13. #13
    JC
    Guest

    Re: Nokia N91, why?

    On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 14:32:47 GMT, Moonshine <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    >Your experience of the N91 is similar to mine with the N70. What a
    >pile of xxxx. I hadn't had a Nokia for ages and was not at all
    >impressed by this symbian phone. Mine went straight back - first time
    >I'd returned a phone.


    .... and our experience with the awful 6680, though we sold ours on
    ebay and went back to our ancient Motorolas. True s**t of the
    smelliest kind, never again.

    The worst part with the 6680 was that unless you removed the battery
    every few days (repeated on two phones), it would start to get slower
    and clunker (and it was one of the slowest and clunkyest phones I've
    used in 18 years of mobile ownership).

    Maybe Nokia have a problem with firmware testing?

    Rgds
    Jonathan



  14. #14
    JC
    Guest

    Re: Nokia N91, why?

    On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 23:45:13 +0100, PajaP <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    >>- Phone takes upto a minute to switch on

    >
    >Yes. Guess it has lots to load. Simple answer, don't turn it off.


    ROFL. I wonder what the world would be like if that was proposed as a
    solution to a similar fault on, say, a stereo system.

    >>- Wireless LAN, can only be used to surf the net? I could not find a
    >>way to transfer any files so its useless IMO.
    >>

    >
    >Cable is best to transfer files. More than happy with transfer rates
    >and I use it daily at work (to replace usb flash drive).


    So what's the point of including WiFi then if it can't actually be
    used for anything useful. It may just be another reason why the
    battery life is so shockingly poor?

    >>Needless to say I returned the phone and got a sony ericsson, never
    >>again will I buy a Nokia after this phone.

    >
    >I am happy with mine. Maybe you should have tried getting a firmware
    >update first.


    Any product that requires a firmware update out of the box, just to
    perform it's supplied function is IMHO not fit for purpose.

    >N91. The best mobile music device there is.


    Shame it's no use as a phone though.

    Rgds
    Jonathan




  15. #15
    JC
    Guest

    Re: Nokia N91, why?

    On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 18:54:28 +0100, PajaP <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    >Not missing the point at all. Turn it off and wait for it to switch on
    >or don't turn it off and recharge it. 30-60 seconds to boot. Not
    >exactly an age is it?


    Spoken as someone who's obviously never had to move regularly to and
    from areas where mobile phones are best left off (not just on silent).
    If I had to wait 30-60 seconds every time I turn my phone on I often
    wouldn't bother with it.

    >It is no trouble to update the firmware and the phone did work from
    >when I got it.


    I went through hell last year trying to get my brand new 6680 updated
    (in the hope it would resolve the usability issues), including costs
    of petrol, parking etc and many hours of wasted time, it must of cost
    me much more than the unconnected price of the phone. That's the
    reward you get for buying Nokia, they don't appear to give a ****
    about their customers and if you go out of your way to try and help
    resolve THEIR issues, you're the one who loses out.

    My advice now is that if a phone doesn't do what it should out of the
    box return it as unfit right away, don't mess around with firmware
    updates etc trying to solve someone elses problem at your expense.

    >I also updated the firmware on my PC motherboard, DVD drive and video
    >card. Updated the firmware in my digital camera. Same for my KISS
    >network DivX player, my Laptop, printer and set-top box. The list
    >could go on.


    You're a brave man. If any of those updates failed claiming under
    warranty would be a really pain if possible at all. I only update
    firmware on such things if recommended by the manufacturers own
    support (so there's some comeback) or if I'm trying to breath new life
    in to old junk (such as a processor upgrade that requires new
    firmware). IMHO to do otherwise is foolhardy unless you regard the
    equipment as valueless.

    >I regularly update the software on my computer along with the hardware
    >drivers. The list could go on.


    That's not the same as firmware. PC operating systems and software can
    relatively easily be reinstalled if all goes wrong. If a firmware
    update fails, usually the only option is a return to manufacturer.
    This may be chargeable, or on older equipment may not even be possible
    at all leaving you with nothing but a paperweight.

    >Service centres are easy to find. Nokia list them on their site.
    >It is free to update if the phone has a problem. If you have no
    >problem there is nothing to stop you saying there is one.


    They may be easy to find, but getting to them costs real time and
    money. You should not have to pay for someone elses problem.

    If I buy a HiFi, I don't expect to have to return it to the shop two
    days later for an "upgrade".

    >>Why should you need to buy another battery though?

    >
    >I have a spare battery for all my phones, not just my N91.
    >I have a spare battery for my digital camera, camcorder and laptop.


    I think the point is that the battery life was much worse than
    claimed.

    >>Bollox! As a music device the Nokia's don't hold a candle to either the
    >>SE Walkman range or the Motorola Rokr and V3's.

    >
    >That is your opinion. Most review sites tend to disagree with you.


    I'll agree with him. Even the V3x is miles better than any Nokia I've
    got for mp3 playback. Having said that I still don't get the point, I
    mean I want a great phone and a great music player. Why would I want
    one device that does both very badly?

    Rgds
    Jonathan



  • Similar Threads




  • Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast