Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 18 of 18
  1. #16
    alexd
    Guest

    Re: Accuracy of dialling code lookups

    Chris Davies wrote:


    > Personally, I don't see how Orange can (legally, not administratively)
    > hide behind the DPA when David Peters asked whether a particular
    > number has been ported to their network. It's a charging issue, not
    > an identification issue, and they're not disclosing anything that will
    > identify the owner of the number.


    We need a 'saynotodpa' or a 'dpawatch' site, where people can post examples
    of organisations hiding behind the DPA due to laziness/stupidity/whatever.

    --
    <http://ale.cx/> (AIM:troffasky) ([email protected])
    17:36:14 up 16 days, 19:36, 2 users, load average: 0.33, 0.28, 0.29
    09 f9 11 02 9d 74 e3 5b d8 41 56 c5 63 56 88 c0




    See More: Accuracy of dialling code lookups




  2. #17
    Andrew Crane
    Guest

    Re: Accuracy of dialling code lookups


    "King Of Fools" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > On 14 May, 15:14, "Andrew Crane" <[email protected]> wrote:
    > > "Andrew Crane" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > > > H3G will cost much more than orange. I don't know how they get away

    with
    > > it,
    > > > but last time I looked, the carrier rates were about 80% more than the
    > > > others.

    > >
    > > ...except of course if the number has been ported from orange to h3g in
    > > which case it will be charged at orange rates.

    >
    > Except if you ring from a mobile where you will be charged at h3g
    > rates!


    I can see if you ring from an Orange phone this could be the case, but I
    doubt the rest would carry a full porting table or exchange porting tables
    with each other.

    Regards
    Andrew






  3. #18
    Andrew Crane
    Guest

    Re: Accuracy of dialling code lookups


    "King Of Fools" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > On 16 May, 11:55, "Andrew Crane" <[email protected]> wrote:
    >> "King Of Fools" <[email protected]> wrote in
    >> messagenews:[email protected]...
    >> > Except if you ring from a mobile where you will be charged at h3g
    >> > rates!

    >>
    >> I can see if you ring from an Orange phone this could be the case, but I
    >> doubt the rest would carry a full porting table or exchange porting
    >> tables
    >> with each other.

    >
    > There are really only two cases for mobile operators. The phone is
    > either on-net or off-net. The mobile operator will know whether the
    > number is on its own network or not and will charge the appropriate
    > fee.


    Sure, but if it is off-net they will not know about the port. Therefore only
    an orange-originated call to a ported-to-H3G number will be charged at the
    higher rate. Originated from anywhere else will be at the originating
    operator's orange rate. I think we might be saying the same thing, but your
    post seemed to me to be saying the higher rate might be more widespread.

    Regards
    Andrew






  • Similar Threads




  • Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12