Results 1 to 6 of 6
- 05-31-2008, 12:12 PM #1Guest
Hi
I want to buy a Samsung phone (don't ask), but it has to have
excellent reception. At home I get two bars if I'm lucky on most of
the ground floor, so I need something with excellent RF performance.
My current dilapidated Motorola will happily make calls there, so I
know it's possible. I've just tried out an E590 which was terrible and
just wouldn't work at all, sent back with a flea in its ear. I've read
reviews of the G600 which say that signal strength is a weakness, so
don't want one of those.
So can anyone point me to a Samsung with strong reception? It doesn't
have to be a current model, so long as it's available from some dodgy
geezer on Ebay.
(A quick bit of research directed me to the A990 as having good
reception
http://www.phonearena.com/htmls/Sams..._1450-p_7.html
However, this does not seem to be stocked even by Ebay's dodgiest
geezers. I think it's a US model, anyone know the UK equivalent?)
Cheers!
Martin
› See More: Samsung with excellent signal strength?
- 05-31-2008, 02:17 PM #2JonGuest
Re: Samsung with excellent signal strength?
In article <3be68c2c-64b5-4418-8ea7-edd37fe4c4e6
@p25g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>, [email protected] says...
> I want to buy a Samsung phone (don't ask), but it has to have
> excellent reception.
It can't be done. In my experience (coming up for 10 years) Samsung's
have to this very day aloways had notably poorer RF performance than
their competitors. I have no idea why that should be so.
--
Regards
Jon
- 05-31-2008, 04:18 PM #3Dennis FergusonGuest
Re: Samsung with excellent signal strength?
On 2008-05-31, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
> (A quick bit of research directed me to the A990 as having good
> reception
> http://www.phonearena.com/htmls/Sams..._1450-p_7.html
> However, this does not seem to be stocked even by Ebay's dodgiest
> geezers. I think it's a US model, anyone know the UK equivalent?)
That's a US CDMA phone, it's a whole other thing. There likely
won't be an equivalent which works in the UK.
Samsung makes quite decent CDMA phones, but the reputation of
their GSM models is awful. You might have some difficulty
finding what you want.
Dennis Ferguson
- 05-31-2008, 04:36 PM #4Steve TerryGuest
Re: Samsung with excellent signal strength?
"Jon" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <3be68c2c-64b5-4418-8ea7-edd37fe4c4e6
> @p25g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>, [email protected] says...
>> I want to buy a Samsung phone (don't ask), but it has to have
>> excellent reception.
>
> It can't be done. In my experience (coming up for 10 years) Samsung's
> have to this very day aloways had notably poorer RF performance than
> their competitors. I have no idea why that should be so.
> Regards
> Jon
>
A lot of it is in the printed tuned shapes aerial designs.
Until recently Ericsson also had problems in this area
Motorola have had lifetimes of experience in RF design
Although I hate Motorola ergonomics, if RF performance was my
first priority I would always go for Motorola.
Steve Terry
- 06-01-2008, 04:30 PM #5Matthew LongGuest
Re: Samsung with excellent signal strength?
<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:3be68c2c-64b5-4418-8ea7-edd37fe4c4e6@p25g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> Hi
>
> I want to buy a Samsung phone (don't ask), but it has to have
> excellent reception. At home I get two bars if I'm lucky on most of
> the ground floor, so I need something with excellent RF performance.
> My current dilapidated Motorola will happily make calls there, so I
> know it's possible. I've just tried out an E590 which was terrible and
> just wouldn't work at all, sent back with a flea in its ear. I've read
> reviews of the G600 which say that signal strength is a weakness, so
> don't want one of those.
Slightly off topic, I'm very pleased with the reception of my Nokia N82.
GSM, 3G, GPS, and WiFi all work *very* well with this phone!
Matthew
- 06-02-2008, 02:14 AM #6Al PacaGuest
Re: Samsung with excellent signal strength?
On Sat, 31 May 2008 11:12:32 -0700 (PDT), [email protected]
wrote:
>excellent reception. At home I get two bars if I'm lucky on most of
>the ground floor, so I need something with excellent RF performance.
You probably don't want to hear this, but IMHO Motorola mobiles have
excellent RF performance. Over the years I have evaluated most makes,
although admittedly not Samsung, and the Motorola's have always been
able to hold a signal where others have failed.
Pity about the user interface though.
Al.
Similar Threads
- Verizon
- alt.cellular.verizon
- Samsung
- alt.cellular.verizon
- alt.cellular.verizon
Desnudar fotos
in General Cell Phone Forum