New Type of Plan

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Doscia <[email protected]> wrote:
>>This is the reason the call center reps are kept the last to know.
>
> The person who told me this works in a Call Center - and it was announced by
> Team Leadsto their Team - nothing was said about not "leaking it" - maybe
> different management types in different Call Centers.

It sounds like that person is you.

- --

Thomas T. Veldhouse
Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE 34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFAiRWO1p0e3NXsrtERAlTgAKCTH7TELdE6eQTQSSyZm/YASoGjYgCfWH8N
viUJ+tegd24xC8IW8+Q3+a4=
=HDG7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---

› See More: New Type of Plan

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In alt.cellular.sprintpcs [email protected] wrote:
> When is the " Fair and Flexible " plan coming out ? Maybe other
> providers will follow . I hope it is not just another marketing ploy
> whith $ gotchas to just somehow fool consumers into sign an adhesion
> type contract but this happens too much in the wireless industry and
> I would like to see all of them with retail unlocked phones and
> prepaid and/or no contract .)
>

I am guessing that you don't lose unused minutes, but you almost
certainly are required to purchase more minutes next month. Thus, if
you have a 500 minute plan and only use 450 minutes, next month at the
start of billing you will have 550 minutes available. If you use 450
minutes again that month, you will have 600 minutes availble the
following month. I am sure it is just a rollover plan. I highly doubt
they could recover aquisition costs any other way.

- --

Thomas T. Veldhouse
Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE 34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFAiRbZ1p0e3NXsrtERAur9AKCe+YJKaamXR5UX7h+hYs5yIgoyOQCgjIlN
iEgDy0BKfiAK4OWu0wNZ7bM=
=eZee
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In article <rmarkoff-753A9B.05471923042004
@news04.east.earthlink.net>, [email protected] says...
> Duh - you just did:
>=20

For someone so dishonest, one would at least think you'd get better=20
at it. No, I did not. I said that something was in the works, and=20
that we'd been specifically told not to release it.

> In article <[email protected]>,
> O/Siris <[email protected]> wrote:
>=20
> > I'm willing to admit that I've been trained on what's coming. And I=20
> > can tell you it's on every single page of the literature SPCS put out=
=20
> > on it.=20
>=20
>=20
> and and so did Doscia:
>=20
>=20

Doscia isn't even a SPCS employee. Another fabrication from the=20
group's worst offender.


--=20
R=D8=DF
O/Siris
I work for Sprint PCS
I *don't* speak for them

In article <rmarkoff-C62EE9.05452723042004
@news04.east.earthlink.net>, [email protected] says...
> It's not confidential to "Doscia"
>=20
>=20

Doscia has already said he (she?) is not an employee. As usual,=20
liar, you're fabricating.

--=20
R=D8=DF
O/Siris
I work for Sprint PCS
I *don't* speak for them

In article <[email protected]>,
O/Siris <0siris@sprīntpcs.com> wrote:

> In article <rmarkoff-C62EE9.05452723042004
> @news04.east.earthlink.net>, [email protected] says...
> > It's not confidential to "Doscia"
> >
> >
>
> Doscia has already said he (she?) is not an employee. As usual,
> liar, you're fabricating.

Embarressment to SprintPCS. Always labeling anyone who disagrees with
him as a liar.

You already confirmed its true.

In article <[email protected]>,
O/Siris <0siris@sprīntpcs.com> wrote:

> No, I did not.

You are always embarressed by what you post in your efforts to sustain
your ego, and then later deny, and call anyone who reminds you of what
you posted a liar.

A true embarressment to SprintPCS.

In article <[email protected]>,
O/Siris <0siris@sprīntpcs.com> wrote:

> In article <rmarkoff-C62EE9.05452723042004
> @news04.east.earthlink.net>, [email protected] says...
> > It's not confidential to "Doscia"
> >
> >
>
> Doscia has already said he (she?) is not an employee. As usual,
> liar, you're fabricating.

In article <[email protected]>,
O/Siris <[email protected]> wrote:

> In article <[email protected]>,
> [email protected]ojunk says...
> > >This is the reason the call center reps are kept the last to know.
> >
> > The person who told me this works in a Call Center - and it was announced by
> > Team Leadsto their Team - nothing was said about not "leaking it" - maybe
> > different management types in different Call Centers.
> >
>
> I'm willing to admit that I've been trained on what's coming. And I
> can tell you it's on every single page of the literature SPCS put out
> on it. Confidential. Not for public release.
>
> There's no room for misunderstanding that.

It's not confidential to "Doscia"

In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected]ojunk (Doscia) wrote:

> Beginning in May Sprint will offer a different type of plan - it will offer
> set
> number of minutes for XXX - then will charge a set amount for different
> blocks
> of minutes - you will pay for minutes you actual use and there will be no
> unused minutes. And no I don't work for Sprint but know someone who does and
> the announcement was made to employees this week. Not sure how many this
> will
> benefit but it is a different slant from current style of plans. For
> instance
> if someone now has a 2000 minute plan because they use over 1000 minutes
> monthly they pay for 2000 minutes even though their usage is around 1500
> monthly. With the new plan they will pay the amount for a plan but will pay
> for only the amount used over the planned minutes.

In article <[email protected]>,
O/Siris <0siris@sprīntpcs.com> wrote:

> In article <rmarkoff-753A9B.05471923042004
> @news04.east.earthlink.net>, [email protected] says...
> > Duh - you just did:
> >
>
> For someone so dishonest, one would at least think you'd get better
> at it. No, I did not. I said that something was in the works, and
> that we'd been specifically told not to release it.
>
> > In article <[email protected]>,
> > O/Siris <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > I'm willing to admit that I've been trained on what's coming. And I
> > > can tell you it's on every single page of the literature SPCS put out
> > > on it.
> >
> >
> > and and so did Doscia:
> >
> >
>
> Doscia isn't even a SPCS employee. Another fabrication from the
> group's worst offender.

No fabrication here it is:

In article <[email protected]>,
O/Siris <[email protected]> wrote:

> In article <[email protected]>,
> [email protected]ojunk says...
> > >This is the reason the call center reps are kept the last to know.
> >
> > The person who told me this works in a Call Center - and it was announced by
> > Team Leadsto their Team - nothing was said about not "leaking it" - maybe
> > different management types in different Call Centers.
> >
>
> I'm willing to admit that I've been trained on what's coming. And I
> can tell you it's on every single page of the literature SPCS put out
> on it. Confidential. Not for public release.
>
> There's no room for misunderstanding that.

It's not confidential to "Doscia"

In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected]ojunk (Doscia) wrote:

> Beginning in May Sprint will offer a different type of plan - it will offer
> set
> number of minutes for XXX - then will charge a set amount for different
> blocks
> of minutes - you will pay for minutes you actual use and there will be no
> unused minutes. And no I don't work for Sprint but know someone who does and
> the announcement was made to employees this week. Not sure how many this
> will
> benefit but it is a different slant from current style of plans. For
> instance
> if someone now has a 2000 minute plan because they use over 1000 minutes
> monthly they pay for 2000 minutes even though their usage is around 1500
> monthly. With the new plan they will pay the amount for a plan but will pay
> for only the amount used over the planned minutes.

In article <rmarkoff-C9AFDA.05440624042004
@news03.east.earthlink.net>, [email protected] says...
> You are always embarressed by what you post in your efforts to sustain=20
> your ego, and then later deny, and call anyone who reminds you of what=20
> you posted a liar.
>=20

You are lying.

Again.

--=20
R=D8=DF
O/Siris
I work for Sprint PCS
I *don't* speak for them

In article <rmarkoff-6B91F9.05425324042004
@news03.east.earthlink.net>, [email protected] says...
> Embarressment to SprintPCS. Always labeling anyone who disagrees with=20
> him as a liar.
>=20
> You already confirmed its true.
>=20

No, liar, just liars. Like you.

Doscia is not an employee, and I confirmed nothing except that=20
something is coming.

--=20
R=D8=DF
O/Siris
I work for Sprint PCS
I *don't* speak for them

In article <[email protected]>,
O/Siris <[email protected]> wrote:

> In article <rmarkoff-C9AFDA.05440624042004
> @news03.east.earthlink.net>, [email protected] says...
> > You are always embarressed by what you post in your efforts to sustain
> > your ego, and then later deny, and call anyone who reminds you of what
> > you posted a liar.
> >
>
> You are lying.
>
> Again.

Thank you for proving how you call everyone a liar.

The embarressment of SprintPCS.

[email protected] (Robert=A0M.) wrote:
<<Thank you for proving how you call everyone a liar. >>

He has never called me a liar. So your claim that he calls "everyone" a
liar would indeed be false.