Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 23 of 23
  1. #16
    Bob Smith
    Guest

    Re: Push to Talk Plans


    "Justin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    >
    > "Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:[email protected]...
    > >
    > > "VZW Guy" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > > news:[email protected]...
    > > > And mabey it will be slower than nextel.. so what, nothing is

    > > perfect..
    > > > if ya dont like it, then dont get it. simple and easy. I believe

    > > though,
    > > > and this is what I have HEARD. that the reason Sprint has not

    come
    > > out
    > > > with it yet is becuz they do not want to introduce it UNTIL they

    are
    > > > under the sub-second delay.. Sooooo *IF* that is true, then

    > > HOPEFULLY
    > > > there wont be any over 1 second delays with "Readylink"...
    > > >
    > > > Try to think positive in life.. being so negative SUCKS!!
    > > >

    > > Justin doesn't know any other way ...
    > >
    > > Bob

    >
    >
    > Better than being an apologist, instantly posting that customer care

    had
    > improved based on the lack of complaints on a freaking usenet forum.


    It's amazing how people think that SPCS is all screwed up by the
    number of comments in this newsgroup about *2, yet when there are more
    positive notes about how calls to *2, and a definite reduction in
    complaints, people won't believe customer service might be improving.

    And I'm not apologizing for anything ... I'm only commenting on what
    I've seen in this newsgroup for the past couple of weeks.

    And as to instantly replying ... I've been commenting through the
    morning ...

    Bob::Thinking all Justin wants to do now is argue, argue, argue::





    See More: Push to Talk Plans




  2. #17
    Justin
    Guest

    Re: Push to Talk Plans


    > > Better than being an apologist, instantly posting that customer care

    > had
    > > improved based on the lack of complaints on a freaking usenet forum.

    >
    > It's amazing how people think that SPCS is all screwed up by the
    > number of comments in this newsgroup about *2, yet when there are more
    > positive notes about how calls to *2, and a definite reduction in
    > complaints, people won't believe customer service might be improving.


    Personally, I don't think this newsgroup is in any way an accurate
    reflection of how *2 is doing, good or bad. Nor is it an accurate
    reflection of customer satisfaction. You did use it however, as a source to
    cite in your statement that CS was improving.


    > And I'm not apologizing for anything ... I'm only commenting on what
    > I've seen in this newsgroup for the past couple of weeks.


    And there's no harm in that at all, unless you use it to prove something
    unrelated. But earlier, it seems you said that customer service was
    improving because you've seen less complaints.


    > And as to instantly replying ... I've been commenting through the
    > morning ...
    >
    > Bob::Thinking all Justin wants to do now is argue, argue, argue::



    No, and I'll let you have the last word. It's just that you were rather
    quick with your praise of *2 and based it on the number of complaints (or
    lack thereof) here. As to Phillipe's comments and my reply, I was just
    stating that it was mainly Rob who was quick to post non-answers, not all
    SprintPCS employees.





  3. #18
    Bob Smith
    Guest

    Re: Push to Talk Plans


    "Justin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    >
    > > > Better than being an apologist, instantly posting that customer

    care
    > > had
    > > > improved based on the lack of complaints on a freaking usenet

    forum.
    > >
    > > It's amazing how people think that SPCS is all screwed up by the
    > > number of comments in this newsgroup about *2, yet when there are

    more
    > > positive notes about how calls to *2, and a definite reduction in
    > > complaints, people won't believe customer service might be

    improving.
    >
    > Personally, I don't think this newsgroup is in any way an accurate
    > reflection of how *2 is doing, good or bad. Nor is it an accurate
    > reflection of customer satisfaction. You did use it however, as a

    source to
    > cite in your statement that CS was improving.


    So, then if one bases their comments on what's seen in here it's
    incorrect? Is that about right? Then that blows Phillippe's posts to
    hell and gone ...

    Look Justin, I've been on this newsgroup a long, long time, and I have
    noticed less complaints being issued, especially since this new code
    was initiated. As newsgroups tend to run more with complaints,
    nitpicking, etc., that's saying something.
    >
    >
    > > And I'm not apologizing for anything ... I'm only commenting on

    what
    > > I've seen in this newsgroup for the past couple of weeks.

    >
    > And there's no harm in that at all, unless you use it to prove

    something
    > unrelated. But earlier, it seems you said that customer service was
    > improving because you've seen less complaints.


    I wasn't trying to prove anything, only to comment on what I was
    noticing.
    >
    >
    > > And as to instantly replying ... I've been commenting through the
    > > morning ...
    > >
    > > Bob::Thinking all Justin wants to do now is argue, argue, argue::

    >
    >
    > No, and I'll let you have the last word. It's just that you were

    rather
    > quick with your praise of *2 and based it on the number of

    complaints (or
    > lack thereof) here. As to Phillipe's comments and my reply, I was

    just
    > stating that it was mainly Rob who was quick to post non-answers,

    not all
    > SprintPCS employees.


    More misstatements Justin. I didn't praise *2 ... I didn't diss it,
    nor praise it ...

    Bob





  4. #19
    Kash76
    Guest

    Re: Push to Talk Plans

    You guys had nothing more to offer. You're probably jealous that he beat you
    to a reply that would have stated the same. You have WAY too much time if
    you just look for Rob's posts and rip his replies.


    "Steven J Sobol" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > Justin <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    > > Neither does posting ambiguities.

    >
    > (a) He may not have details.
    > (b) He may have them but not be allowed to give them out.
    >
    > --
    > JustThe.net Internet & Multimedia Services
    > 22674 Motnocab Road * Apple Valley, CA 92307-1950
    > Steve Sobol, Proprietor
    > 888.480.4NET (4638) * 248.724.4NET * [email protected]






  5. #20
    none
    Guest

    Re: Push to Talk Plans

    On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 18:03:24 GMT, "Justin" <[email protected]> said:


    >It's typical of Rob, anyway.
    >

    So should he post company information and risk losing his job to make
    you happy? Ironically just today.. I was tasked with indexing two
    full cd's of email and documents for court pertaining to Verizon vs
    Nextel over PTT. Do you think I would come here and spout off
    information just to feed the trolls? No. I value my job.

    http://www.wirelessweek.com/index.as...cleid=CA314175
    http://www.theaxcess.net/technology_04_0803.html
    http://www.geek.com/news/geeknews/20...0630020617.htm



  6. #21
    Justin Green
    Guest

    Re: Push to Talk Plans


    "none" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 18:03:24 GMT, "Justin" <[email protected]> said:
    >
    >
    > >It's typical of Rob, anyway.
    > >

    > So should he post company information and risk losing his job to make
    > you happy?


    No, he should keep on posting drivel. It's what we've all come to expect.


    Ironically just today.. I was tasked with indexing two
    > full cd's of email and documents for court pertaining to Verizon vs
    > Nextel over PTT. Do you think I would come here and spout off
    > information just to feed the trolls? No. I value my job.
    >
    > http://www.wirelessweek.com/index.as...cleid=CA314175
    > http://www.theaxcess.net/technology_04_0803.html
    > http://www.geek.com/news/geeknews/20...0630020617.htm






  7. #22
    O/Siris .
    Guest

    Re: Push to Talk Plans

    Steven J Sobol <[email protected]> wrote in article
    <[email protected]>:
    > Justin <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    > > Neither does posting ambiguities.

    >
    > (a) He may not have details.
    > (b) He may have them but not be allowed to give them out.
    >
    > --
    > JustThe.net Internet & Multimedia Services
    > 22674 Motnocab Road * Apple Valley, CA 92307-1950
    > Steve Sobol, Proprietor
    > 888.480.4NET (4638) * 248.724.4NET * [email protected]


    I don't have all of them, but (b) is pretty much it. Which wouldn't
    surprise anyone looking at this objectively, rather than trying to "get"
    someone.

    --
    -+-
    RØß
    O/Siris
    I work for Sprint PCS
    I *don't* speak for them

    [posted via phonescoop.com]



  8. #23
    Justin Green
    Guest

    Re: Push to Talk Plans


    "O/Siris ." <robjvargas@sprîntpcs.côm> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > Steven J Sobol <[email protected]> wrote in article
    > <[email protected]>:
    > > Justin <[email protected]> wrote:
    > >
    > > > Neither does posting ambiguities.

    > >
    > > (a) He may not have details.
    > > (b) He may have them but not be allowed to give them out.
    > >
    > > --
    > > JustThe.net Internet & Multimedia Services
    > > 22674 Motnocab Road * Apple Valley, CA 92307-1950
    > > Steve Sobol, Proprietor
    > > 888.480.4NET (4638) * 248.724.4NET * [email protected]

    >
    > I don't have all of them, but (b) is pretty much it. Which wouldn't
    > surprise anyone looking at this objectively, rather than trying to "get"
    > someone.
    >
    > --
    > -+-
    > RØß
    > O/Siris
    > I work for Sprint PCS
    > I *don't* speak for them
    >
    > [posted via phonescoop.com]



    You know all about trying to "get" someone, don't you Rob?





  • Similar Threads




  • Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12