Results 16 to 23 of 23
- 09-22-2003, 01:17 PM #16Bob SmithGuest
Re: Push to Talk Plans
"Justin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > "VZW Guy" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > > And mabey it will be slower than nextel.. so what, nothing is
> > perfect..
> > > if ya dont like it, then dont get it. simple and easy. I believe
> > though,
> > > and this is what I have HEARD. that the reason Sprint has not
come
> > out
> > > with it yet is becuz they do not want to introduce it UNTIL they
are
> > > under the sub-second delay.. Sooooo *IF* that is true, then
> > HOPEFULLY
> > > there wont be any over 1 second delays with "Readylink"...
> > >
> > > Try to think positive in life.. being so negative SUCKS!!
> > >
> > Justin doesn't know any other way ...
> >
> > Bob
>
>
> Better than being an apologist, instantly posting that customer care
had
> improved based on the lack of complaints on a freaking usenet forum.
It's amazing how people think that SPCS is all screwed up by the
number of comments in this newsgroup about *2, yet when there are more
positive notes about how calls to *2, and a definite reduction in
complaints, people won't believe customer service might be improving.
And I'm not apologizing for anything ... I'm only commenting on what
I've seen in this newsgroup for the past couple of weeks.
And as to instantly replying ... I've been commenting through the
morning ...
Bob::Thinking all Justin wants to do now is argue, argue, argue::
› See More: Push to Talk Plans
- 09-22-2003, 01:28 PM #17JustinGuest
Re: Push to Talk Plans
> > Better than being an apologist, instantly posting that customer care
> had
> > improved based on the lack of complaints on a freaking usenet forum.
>
> It's amazing how people think that SPCS is all screwed up by the
> number of comments in this newsgroup about *2, yet when there are more
> positive notes about how calls to *2, and a definite reduction in
> complaints, people won't believe customer service might be improving.
Personally, I don't think this newsgroup is in any way an accurate
reflection of how *2 is doing, good or bad. Nor is it an accurate
reflection of customer satisfaction. You did use it however, as a source to
cite in your statement that CS was improving.
> And I'm not apologizing for anything ... I'm only commenting on what
> I've seen in this newsgroup for the past couple of weeks.
And there's no harm in that at all, unless you use it to prove something
unrelated. But earlier, it seems you said that customer service was
improving because you've seen less complaints.
> And as to instantly replying ... I've been commenting through the
> morning ...
>
> Bob::Thinking all Justin wants to do now is argue, argue, argue::
No, and I'll let you have the last word. It's just that you were rather
quick with your praise of *2 and based it on the number of complaints (or
lack thereof) here. As to Phillipe's comments and my reply, I was just
stating that it was mainly Rob who was quick to post non-answers, not all
SprintPCS employees.
- 09-22-2003, 01:52 PM #18Bob SmithGuest
Re: Push to Talk Plans
"Justin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> > > Better than being an apologist, instantly posting that customer
care
> > had
> > > improved based on the lack of complaints on a freaking usenet
forum.
> >
> > It's amazing how people think that SPCS is all screwed up by the
> > number of comments in this newsgroup about *2, yet when there are
more
> > positive notes about how calls to *2, and a definite reduction in
> > complaints, people won't believe customer service might be
improving.
>
> Personally, I don't think this newsgroup is in any way an accurate
> reflection of how *2 is doing, good or bad. Nor is it an accurate
> reflection of customer satisfaction. You did use it however, as a
source to
> cite in your statement that CS was improving.
So, then if one bases their comments on what's seen in here it's
incorrect? Is that about right? Then that blows Phillippe's posts to
hell and gone ...
Look Justin, I've been on this newsgroup a long, long time, and I have
noticed less complaints being issued, especially since this new code
was initiated. As newsgroups tend to run more with complaints,
nitpicking, etc., that's saying something.
>
>
> > And I'm not apologizing for anything ... I'm only commenting on
what
> > I've seen in this newsgroup for the past couple of weeks.
>
> And there's no harm in that at all, unless you use it to prove
something
> unrelated. But earlier, it seems you said that customer service was
> improving because you've seen less complaints.
I wasn't trying to prove anything, only to comment on what I was
noticing.
>
>
> > And as to instantly replying ... I've been commenting through the
> > morning ...
> >
> > Bob::Thinking all Justin wants to do now is argue, argue, argue::
>
>
> No, and I'll let you have the last word. It's just that you were
rather
> quick with your praise of *2 and based it on the number of
complaints (or
> lack thereof) here. As to Phillipe's comments and my reply, I was
just
> stating that it was mainly Rob who was quick to post non-answers,
not all
> SprintPCS employees.
More misstatements Justin. I didn't praise *2 ... I didn't diss it,
nor praise it ...
Bob
- 09-22-2003, 05:22 PM #19Kash76Guest
Re: Push to Talk Plans
You guys had nothing more to offer. You're probably jealous that he beat you
to a reply that would have stated the same. You have WAY too much time if
you just look for Rob's posts and rip his replies.
"Steven J Sobol" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Justin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Neither does posting ambiguities.
>
> (a) He may not have details.
> (b) He may have them but not be allowed to give them out.
>
> --
> JustThe.net Internet & Multimedia Services
> 22674 Motnocab Road * Apple Valley, CA 92307-1950
> Steve Sobol, Proprietor
> 888.480.4NET (4638) * 248.724.4NET * [email protected]
- 09-22-2003, 06:45 PM #20noneGuest
Re: Push to Talk Plans
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 18:03:24 GMT, "Justin" <[email protected]> said:
>It's typical of Rob, anyway.
>
So should he post company information and risk losing his job to make
you happy? Ironically just today.. I was tasked with indexing two
full cd's of email and documents for court pertaining to Verizon vs
Nextel over PTT. Do you think I would come here and spout off
information just to feed the trolls? No. I value my job.
http://www.wirelessweek.com/index.as...cleid=CA314175
http://www.theaxcess.net/technology_04_0803.html
http://www.geek.com/news/geeknews/20...0630020617.htm
- 09-22-2003, 07:02 PM #21Justin GreenGuest
Re: Push to Talk Plans
"none" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 18:03:24 GMT, "Justin" <[email protected]> said:
>
>
> >It's typical of Rob, anyway.
> >
> So should he post company information and risk losing his job to make
> you happy?
No, he should keep on posting drivel. It's what we've all come to expect.
Ironically just today.. I was tasked with indexing two
> full cd's of email and documents for court pertaining to Verizon vs
> Nextel over PTT. Do you think I would come here and spout off
> information just to feed the trolls? No. I value my job.
>
> http://www.wirelessweek.com/index.as...cleid=CA314175
> http://www.theaxcess.net/technology_04_0803.html
> http://www.geek.com/news/geeknews/20...0630020617.htm
- 09-23-2003, 03:13 PM #22O/Siris .Guest
Re: Push to Talk Plans
Steven J Sobol <[email protected]> wrote in article
<[email protected]>:
> Justin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Neither does posting ambiguities.
>
> (a) He may not have details.
> (b) He may have them but not be allowed to give them out.
>
> --
> JustThe.net Internet & Multimedia Services
> 22674 Motnocab Road * Apple Valley, CA 92307-1950
> Steve Sobol, Proprietor
> 888.480.4NET (4638) * 248.724.4NET * [email protected]
I don't have all of them, but (b) is pretty much it. Which wouldn't
surprise anyone looking at this objectively, rather than trying to "get"
someone.
--
-+-
RØß
O/Siris
I work for Sprint PCS
I *don't* speak for them
[posted via phonescoop.com]
- 09-23-2003, 04:15 PM #23Justin GreenGuest
Re: Push to Talk Plans
"O/Siris ." <robjvargas@sprîntpcs.côm> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Steven J Sobol <[email protected]> wrote in article
> <[email protected]>:
> > Justin <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Neither does posting ambiguities.
> >
> > (a) He may not have details.
> > (b) He may have them but not be allowed to give them out.
> >
> > --
> > JustThe.net Internet & Multimedia Services
> > 22674 Motnocab Road * Apple Valley, CA 92307-1950
> > Steve Sobol, Proprietor
> > 888.480.4NET (4638) * 248.724.4NET * [email protected]
>
> I don't have all of them, but (b) is pretty much it. Which wouldn't
> surprise anyone looking at this objectively, rather than trying to "get"
> someone.
>
> --
> -+-
> RØß
> O/Siris
> I work for Sprint PCS
> I *don't* speak for them
>
> [posted via phonescoop.com]
You know all about trying to "get" someone, don't you Rob?
Similar Threads
- alt.cellular.nokia
- alt.cellular.verizon
- alt.cellular.cingular
- alt.cellular.verizon
- alt.cellular.nextel
The Ukrainian Review
in Chit Chat