Results 16 to 30 of 39
- 10-15-2003, 05:33 AM #16Loving MoonlightGuest
Re: Anonymous Identified
Can't very well be an unlisted number if its listed both at
www.whitepages.com
and
people.yahoo.com
› See More: Anonymous Identified
- 10-15-2003, 06:43 AM #17Thomas T. VeldhouseGuest
Re: Anonymous Identified
"Michael L. Arends" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> >
>
> No Tom I didn't. Sorry if it sounded that way. I KNOW who posted it.
> Sorry If I didn't make that clearer.
>
I was referring to your other post in this thread.
"Well Tom, the fact is, it wasn't me. I don't know what all has been said in
here, as I have been too busy lately to read this group a lot. But I do
know, in washington state it is a criminal matter to post a
unlisted/unpublished phone #"
Tom Veldhouse
- 10-15-2003, 06:45 AM #18Thomas T. VeldhouseGuest
Re: Anonymous Identified
"Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
>
> So Phillippe, now you are resorting to using female names? And 4
> different IDs in the past two days? Geez, you really are desperate to
> be heard ....
>
> Bob
>
>
He used a name that somebody (probably him) used earlier from Phonescoop.
It is almost as if he is posting off target posts so that his later attacks
can appear to be somebody other than him. He is making lame attempts at
sophistication.
Tom Veldhouse
- 10-15-2003, 07:04 AM #19Michael ArendsGuest
Re: Anonymous Identified
Loving Moonlight wrote:
>
> Can't very well be an unlisted number if its listed both at
>
> www.whitepages.com
>
> and
>
> people.yahoo.com
Don't know about that. All I know, is it is SUPPOSED to be
unlisted/unpublished.
- 10-15-2003, 07:46 AM #20Loving MoonlightGuest
Re: Anonymous Identified
>>Loving Moonlight wrote:
>
>> Can't very well be an unlisted number if its listed both at
>>
>> www.whitepages.com
>>
>> and
>>
>> people.yahoo.com
[email protected] wrote:
> Don't know about that. All I know, is it is SUPPOSED > to be
unlisted/unpublished.
====================
Obviously it's publically available and listed.
also at
http://www.switchboard.com
http://www.anywho.com
http://www.whowhere.lycos.com/phone.html
hardly unpublished. Ask your nephew.
- 10-15-2003, 07:51 AM #21Thomas T. VeldhouseGuest
Re: Anonymous Identified
"Michael Arends" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Loving Moonlight wrote:
> >
> > Can't very well be an unlisted number if its listed both at
> >
> > www.whitepages.com
> >
> > and
> >
> > people.yahoo.com
>
> Don't know about that. All I know, is it is SUPPOSED to be
> unlisted/unpublished.
They charge you monthly for an unlisted/unpublished number. Check your bill
to see if there is a line item charge for that.
Tom Veldhouse
- 10-15-2003, 08:07 AM #22Brian petersonGuest
Re: Anonymous Identified
>
> They charge you monthly for an unlisted/unpublished number. Check your bill
> to see if there is a line item charge for that.
>
I don't pay for an unlisted #, what I did was have the phone company
list the phone under another name like Harry Johnson that way it is in a
way unlisted. Just don't give your # out, and have it listed on the
national do not call list. I haven't gotten a telemarketer call in over
2 years.
[posted via phonescoop.com]
- 10-15-2003, 08:28 AM #23Thomas T. VeldhouseGuest
Re: Anonymous Identified
"Brian peterson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> >
> > They charge you monthly for an unlisted/unpublished number. Check your
bill
> > to see if there is a line item charge for that.
> >
>
>
> I don't pay for an unlisted #, what I did was have the phone company
> list the phone under another name like Harry Johnson that way it is in a
> way unlisted. Just don't give your # out, and have it listed on the
> national do not call list. I haven't gotten a telemarketer call in over
> 2 years.
Who is your phone company? I know QWest certainly won't allow that. I
would be surprised if it is even legal for them to do so.
Tom Veldhouse
- 10-15-2003, 08:38 AM #24Brian petersonGuest
Re: Anonymous Identified
> Who is your phone company? I know QWest certainly won't allow that. I
> would be surprised if it is even legal for them to do so.
>
SBC, and they were the ones who suggested it. All it is doing is
changing the name listed in the phone book.
[posted via phonescoop.com]
- 10-15-2003, 09:20 AM #25Jerome ZelinskeGuest
Re: Anonymous Identified
Do they also allow a fake address?
Brian peterson wrote:
>>Who is your phone company? I know QWest certainly won't allow that. I
>>would be surprised if it is even legal for them to do so.
>>
>
>
> SBC, and they were the ones who suggested it. All it is doing is
> changing the name listed in the phone book.
>
> [posted via phonescoop.com]
- 10-15-2003, 09:33 AM #26John R. CopelandGuest
Re: Anonymous Identified
I heard about an SBC customer who listed his name as "Ting Tang".
Anybody who called asking for that name would get played a recording
of the "Witch Doctor" song. You know ---
"Oooh, Eeeh, Oo Ah Ah.
Ting, Tang, Walla Walla Bing Bang", etc.
---JRC---
"Brian peterson" <[email protected]> wrote in message =
news:[email protected]...
> > Who is your phone company? I know QWest certainly won't allow that. =
I
> > would be surprised if it is even legal for them to do so.
> >=20
>=20
> SBC, and they were the ones who suggested it. All it is doing is
> changing the name listed in the phone book.
>=20
- 10-15-2003, 10:05 AM #27Michael ArendsGuest
Re: Anonymous Identified
"Thomas T. Veldhouse" wrote:
>
> "Michael Arends" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > Loving Moonlight wrote:
> > >
> > > Can't very well be an unlisted number if its listed both at
> > >
> > > www.whitepages.com
> > >
> > > and
> > >
> > > people.yahoo.com
> >
> > Don't know about that. All I know, is it is SUPPOSED to be
> > unlisted/unpublished.
>
> They charge you monthly for an unlisted/unpublished number. Check your bill
> to see if there is a line item charge for that.
>
> Tom Veldhouse
I'm going to do that. Thanks.
- 10-15-2003, 10:52 AM #28Steven J SobolGuest
Re: Anonymous Identified
Brian peterson <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Who is your phone company? I know QWest certainly won't allow that. I
>> would be surprised if it is even legal for them to do so.
>>
>
> SBC, and they were the ones who suggested it. All it is doing is
> changing the name listed in the phone book.
Of course, that may cause someone else to receive phone calls that were meant
for you, but why should you care if you inconvenience someone else?
--
JustThe.net Internet & Multimedia Services
22674 Motnocab Road * Apple Valley, CA 92307-1950
Steve Sobol, Proprietor
888.480.4NET (4638) * 248.724.4NET * [email protected]
- 10-15-2003, 11:06 AM #29Brian petersonGuest
Re: Anonymous Identified
> Do they also allow a fake address?
>
>
I told them not to list the address.
[posted via phonescoop.com]
- 10-15-2003, 11:24 AM #30Brian petersonGuest
Re: Anonymous Identified
> Of course, that may cause someone else to receive phone calls that were meant
> for you, but why should you care if you inconvenience someone else?
>
What are you talking about?!?!? I had the listing posted under
'Illusion Name' in the phone book now please explain how someone else is
going to get my calls, and how it would inconvenience someone else!!
[posted via phonescoop.com]
Similar Threads
- Telus
- Samsung
- RingTones
- alt.cellular.nokia
- alt.cellular.motorola
The Ukrainian Review
in Chit Chat