short range, directional mobile phone jammer?

<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]

[snip]

: : For Gods sake Ivor how did you manage before mobile
: : phones where invented, the only time my phone mobile IS
: : switched on is when I wish to make a call or when I
: : know I am going to be called and the approximate time
: : of the incoming call at any other time the phone is
: : switched if like it is now .

Who on earth would want to ring you..?

Ivor

---

› See More: short range, directional mobile phone jammer?

Chris Tolley <[email protected]> wrote:

> paranoid bob wrote:
>
> > TBirdFrank <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> Is there still a railway bye-law - as there used to be - prohibiting
> >> the playing of radios, musical instruments etc to the annoyance of
> >> other pasengers???
> >
> > Yes there certainly is. And on buses.
> >
> >> There damn well should be
> >
> > Do the staff enforce it? They damn well don't!
>
> I have seen BTP CSO's enforce it, but never rail staff.

I've never seen a BTP person on a train, only in stations.

In message <[email protected]>, at
09:54:55 on Thu, 9 Aug 2007, paranoid bob <"paranoid.bob."@example.com>
remarked:
>Fast food should be banned on trains.

Including fast food from the train's own buffet?
--
Roland Perry

"Ivor Jones" <[email protected]> wrote:

> <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]
>
> [snip]
>
> : : For Gods sake Ivor how did you manage before mobile
> : : phones where invented, the only time my phone mobile IS
> : : switched on is when I wish to make a call or when I
> : : know I am going to be called and the approximate time
> : : of the incoming call at any other time the phone is
> : : switched if like it is now .
>
> Who on earth would want to ring you..?

Perhaps he talks more clearly than he writes?
(I doubt it, but it's possible.)

[email protected] wrote:

> Of course your time will come to enjoy the fruits of retirement that
> is if you do not kill yourself first due to riding your stupid motor
> bike .

By the looks of things, the Alzheimers will be getting you shortly, which
will be a blessed ****ing relief.

--
<http://ale.cx/> (AIM:troffasky) ([email protected])
19:04:45 up 23 days, 49 min, 3 users, load average: 1.09, 0.81, 0.57
09 f9 11 02 9d 74 e3 5b d8 41 56 c5 63 56 88 c0

R. Mark Clayton wrote:

> Not only that but you would get nicked.

....and probably on trumped up terrorism charges, at that. Best make sure you
look good in an orange jumpsuit before you turn on that GSM jammer, sonny!

--
<http://ale.cx/> (AIM:troffasky) ([email protected])
19:10:07 up 23 days, 54 min, 3 users, load average: 0.29, 0.41, 0.45
09 f9 11 02 9d 74 e3 5b d8 41 56 c5 63 56 88 c0

Roland Perry <[email protected]> wrote:

> >Fast food should be banned on trains.
>
> Including fast food from the train's own buffet?

That doesn't stink like McDonald's filth.

In message
<[email protected]>, at
21:09:10 on Thu, 9 Aug 2007, paranoid bob <[email protected]>
remarked:
>> >Fast food should be banned on trains.
>>
>> Including fast food from the train's own buffet?
>
>That doesn't stink like McDonald's filth.

The microwave burgers seem pretty similar to me, but I don't have a very
good sense of smell
--
Roland Perry

JW <[email protected]> wrote:

> alexd wrote:
> > R. Mark Clayton wrote:
> >
> >> Not only that but you would get nicked.
> >
> > ...and probably on trumped up terrorism charges, at that. Best make sure you
> > look good in an orange jumpsuit before you turn on that GSM jammer, sonny!
> >
>
> Pressing buttons on suspicious-looking gadgets might provoke
> a more immediate response from fellow passengers.

This one looks like a phone.
http://starportuk.com/91.htm

paranoid bob <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:

> JW <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> alexd wrote:
>> > R. Mark Clayton wrote:
>> >
>> >> Not only that but you would get nicked.
>> >
>> > ...and probably on trumped up terrorism charges, at that. Best make
>> > sure you look good in an orange jumpsuit before you turn on that
>> > GSM jammer, sonny!
>> >
>>
>> Pressing buttons on suspicious-looking gadgets might provoke
>> a more immediate response from fellow passengers.
>
> This one looks like a phone.
> http://starportuk.com/91.htm
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

"Spec: Jams GSM phones only. Suitable for use throughout Europe, The
Middle East & Africa. Not suitable for North America."

.....before the Americans and Canadians reading this have their orgasms
and waste their money.....(c;

Europe is on different frequencies than North America....all part of the
scheme to prevent us from having a phone that will work across the planet
without paying exhorbitant amounts.





These bastards keep calling me so I'm feeding them to the spambots.
--
Sunrise Communications
1374 E. Republic Rd.
Springfield, MO 65804
866-483-1228
417-886-7091
http://www.sunrisecommunicationsinc.com/
877-842-3210
866-842-3278
United Healthcare
http://www.unitedhealthcareonline.com/

there once was an idea to jam the main stations so as to generate more BT
phone revenue


"paranoid bob" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> JW <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> alexd wrote:
>> > R. Mark Clayton wrote:
>> >
>> >> Not only that but you would get nicked.
>> >
>> > ...and probably on trumped up terrorism charges, at that. Best make
>> > sure you
>> > look good in an orange jumpsuit before you turn on that GSM jammer,
>> > sonny!
>> >
>>
>> Pressing buttons on suspicious-looking gadgets might provoke
>> a more immediate response from fellow passengers.
>
> This one looks like a phone.
> http://starportuk.com/91.htm
>
>
>
>
>
>

Larry schrieb:
> [...]
> Europe is on different frequencies than North America....all part of the
> scheme to prevent us from having a phone that will work across the planet
> without paying exhorbitant amounts.

You haven't noticed that about 90% of all phones are quadband, these days?

paranoid bob (or somebody else of the same name) wrote thusly in message
<[email protected]>:

>> Pressing buttons on suspicious-looking gadgets might provoke
>> a more immediate response from fellow passengers.
>
> This one looks like a phone.
> http://starportuk.com/91.htm

That only makes it even more suspicious.
--
ΞΎ Proud to be curly

Interchange the alphabetic letter groups to reply

Andreas Wenzel <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:

> Larry schrieb:
>> [...]
>> Europe is on different frequencies than North America....all part of
>> the scheme to prevent us from having a phone that will work across
>> the planet without paying exhorbitant amounts.
>
> You haven't noticed that about 90% of all phones are quadband, these
> days?
>

You haven't noticed that about 100% of the calls made in the US are not
made on all four of those bands these days?

Scott schrieb:
> Andreas Wenzel <[email protected]> wrote in
> news:[email protected]:
>
>> Larry schrieb:
>>> [...]
>>> Europe is on different frequencies than North America....all part of
>>> the scheme to prevent us from having a phone that will work across
>>> the planet without paying exhorbitant amounts.
>> You haven't noticed that about 90% of all phones are quadband, these
>> days?
>>
>
> You haven't noticed that about 100% of the calls made in the US are not
> made on all four of those bands these days?

And the added price for making a phone quadband is exactly what? And
don't you say "exorbitant" ;-)

My guess is that this price is even a negative one because the
manufacturers no longer need to feed two production lines for NA and the
rest of the world.

Andreas