reply to discussion
Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 64
  1. #31
    John Navas
    Guest

    Re: fanboy nonsense about netbook vs. iPad debunked

    On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 14:38:58 +0000, in
    <[email protected]>, Larry <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    >nospam <[email protected]> wrote in news:130620100038521497%
    >[email protected]:
    >
    >> it is also twice the weight and a little more than half the battery
    >> life.

    >
    >Oh, horse****. It weighs 2oz and runs for days, far longer than you'll be
    >traveling unless you're an over-the-road truck driver.
    >
    >It's greatest benefit is you can sit the GPS puck in the window so it can
    >see the satellite cluster, then only have to have the netbook/tablet in 10
    >meters of it so Bluetooth can connect. You don't HAVE to sit in the window
    >using the shiny screen piece of **** you can't see in the sunlight just to
    >get a decent GPS signal that's not jerking around all over the place.
    >
    >Now, tell us about your ****pad being clairvoyant and can see GPS
    >satellites 16000 miles away through a solid steel roof perfectly....(sigh)


    "Never argue with an idiot. He'll drag you down to his level
    and then beat you with experience." -Dr. Alan Zimmerman



    See More: fanboy nonsense about netbook vs. iPad debunked




  2. #32
    nospam
    Guest

    Re: fanboy nonsense about netbook vs. iPad debunked

    In article <[email protected]>, Larry
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    > > it is also twice the weight and a little more than half the battery
    > > life.

    >
    > Oh, horse****. It weighs 2oz and runs for days, far longer than you'll be
    > traveling unless you're an over-the-road truck driver.


    bull****.

    the samsung nc10 weighs 2.8 pounds. the ipad weights 1.5 pounds.

    <http://www.samsung.com/us/consumer/o...g/netbooks/NP-
    NC10-KA02US/index.idx?pagetype=prd_detail&tab=spec>



  3. #33
    nospam
    Guest

    Re: fanboy nonsense about netbook vs. iPad debunked

    In article <[email protected]>, John Navas
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    > To be fair, you can buy non-Apple add-on battery packs for iToys that


    the fact that you resort to name calling says more about you than it
    does about the product, namely that you're a hypocrite.

    > will greatly extend their runtime while charging their main batteries at
    > the same time. But it's nonetheless more convenient to swap batteries,
    > especially when the battery needs to be replaced.


    except that in typical use, it rarely needs to be replaced. most people
    can go a week without recharging. unless you live in a forest, it's not
    a problem.



  4. #34
    DevilsPGD
    Guest

    Re: fanboy nonsense about netbook vs. iPad debunked

    In message <[email protected]> John Navas
    <[email protected]> was claimed to have wrote:

    >I have never seen a single documented Flash crash in either my personal
    >or professional experience. Have I just been lucky? Or is it because
    >I keep all software properly updated?


    Either luck, inability to determine that a browser crash was flash
    related, or you simply don't use flash much.



  5. #35
    SMS
    Guest

    Re: fanboy nonsense about netbook vs. iPad debunked

    On 12/06/10 9:38 PM, nospam wrote:

    > in other words, the gps is *external*. thanks for confirming what i
    > said.


    There's actually a big advantage to the external GPS pucks, or at least
    external GPS antennas that connect to an internal GPS receiver.



  6. #36
    nospam
    Guest

    Re: fanboy nonsense about netbook vs. iPad debunked

    In article <[email protected]>, DevilsPGD
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    > In message <[email protected]> John Navas
    > <[email protected]> was claimed to have wrote:
    > >I have never seen a single documented Flash crash in either my personal
    > >or professional experience. Have I just been lucky? Or is it because
    > >I keep all software properly updated?

    >
    > Either luck, inability to determine that a browser crash was flash
    > related, or you simply don't use flash much.


    or he's lying.



  7. #37
    nospam
    Guest

    Re: fanboy nonsense about netbook vs. iPad debunked

    In article <[email protected]>, SMS
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    > > in other words, the gps is *external*. thanks for confirming what i
    > > said.

    >
    > There's actually a big advantage to the external GPS pucks, or at least
    > external GPS antennas that connect to an internal GPS receiver.


    there is flexibility in putting a gps puck someplace that's optimum
    with the tablet/netbook/laptop elsewhere, but on the other hand, it's
    an extra item to lose.

    people make a big fuss over the camera connector and other accessories
    on the ipad, but somehow it's ok for a gps puck?



  8. #38
    John Navas
    Guest

    Re: fanboy nonsense about netbook vs. iPad debunked

    On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 23:36:32 -0700, in
    <[email protected]>, DevilsPGD
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    >In message <[email protected]> John Navas
    ><[email protected]> was claimed to have wrote:
    >
    >>I have never seen a single documented Flash crash in either my personal
    >>or professional experience. Have I just been lucky? Or is it because
    >>I keep all software properly updated?

    >
    >Either luck, inability to determine that a browser crash was flash
    >related, or you simply don't use flash much.


    I use the Web at least as intensively as anyone else.
    My browsers don't crash. My friends and clients likewise.
    Perhaps you've got system problems unrelated to Flash.

    --
    Best regards,
    John

    If the iPhone and iPad are really so impressive,
    then why do iFans keep making excuses for them?



  9. #39
    John Navas
    Guest

    Re: fanboy nonsense about netbook vs. iPad debunked

    On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 06:43:55 -0700, in
    <[email protected]>, SMS
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    >On 14/06/10 1:41 AM, nospam wrote:


    >> there is flexibility in putting a gps puck someplace that's optimum
    >> with the tablet/netbook/laptop elsewhere, but on the other hand, it's
    >> an extra item to lose.
    >>
    >> people make a big fuss over the camera connector and other accessories
    >> on the ipad, but somehow it's ok for a gps puck?

    >
    >Yes, because the GPS puck (or external antenna) adds extremely useful
    >functionality that is not possible to build into the base unit. I have a
    >tablet PC and I've used a Cardbus GPS in it. Without the external
    >antenna it's very difficult to use in a car as a GPS because it's too
    >large to have on top of the dashboard (where it has a clear view of the
    >sky), but if you mount it to the right of the driver in front of the
    >dashboard it usually does not pick up enough satellites (even with the
    >sun roof open!).


    Then it's a poor GPS receiver.
    Better GPS receivers (e.g., SiRF) have no such hassles.

    --
    Best regards,
    John

    "A little learning is a dangerous thing." -Alexander Pope
    "It is better to sit in silence and appear ignorant,
    than to open your mouth and remove all doubt." -Mark Twain
    "Being ignorant is not so much a shame, as being unwilling to learn."
    -Benjamin Franklin



  10. #40
    John Navas
    Guest

    Re: fanboy nonsense about netbook vs. iPad debunked

    On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 05:40:27 -0400, in
    <[email protected]>, Todd Allcock
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    >At 13 Jun 2010 00:38:52 -0400 nospam wrote:
    >
    >> > > for some things, but not for others. how well does that netbook help
    >> > > you navigate without a gps or compass?
    >> >
    >> > What the hell are you talking about? My Samsung NC10 has a 20 channel,

    >
    >> > WAAS-compensated, bluetooth GPS receiver so accurate it will place the
    >> > little GPS puck in the exact parking space at the mall.

    >>
    >> it does not have a gps or a compass.
    >>
    >> > It's the same
    >> > little pocket puck I use on my Nokia N800 Linux tablets.

    >>
    >> in other words, the gps is *external*. thanks for confirming what i
    >> said.

    >
    >Well, to be fair, the GPS is only included with the iPad 3G, ...


    That's because it's (cheaper) A-GPS (Assisted GPS),
    which isn't as accurate as (mor expensive) standalone GPS.

    --
    Best regards,
    John

    If the iPhone and iPad are really so impressive,
    then why do iFans keep making excuses for them?



  11. #41
    News
    Guest

    Re: fanboy nonsense about netbook vs. iPad debunked

    Larry wrote:
    > John Navas <[email protected]> wrote in
    > news:[email protected]:
    >
    >> Then it's a poor GPS receiver.
    >> Better GPS receivers (e.g., SiRF) have no such hassles.
    >>
    >>

    >
    > I'm surprised at you, John. GPS isn't a problem for receivers, by its
    > very analog nature, GPS requires a CLEAR, UNOBSTRUCTED, DIRECT PATH to
    > the birds.
    >
    > GPS works on the time it takes the signal to move from the bird to the
    > receiver....Anything that upsets that timing path, trashes the timing
    > and trashes the fix. It's pure physics.
    >
    > If you have a multipath signal from the bird, a weak or no direct
    > signal, the time it takes the pulse train to arrive from the bird is
    > LONGER by microseconds. The path from 8 is really long, the path from
    > 12 is shorter, but still not direct. The path from 10 is direct but
    > fades in and out. The path from 13 is direct and strong. The
    > convergence of all these multiple odd length timing paths, makes the
    > calculation each second horribly wrong. And I can prove it to you.
    >
    > Go to any fast food joint you like that has a roof loaded with AC units,
    > preferably one with a steel roof to block all the direct signal to make
    > the problem worse. Pick one on a busy highway near a busy airport so we
    > don't have to wait to see the effect of the passing trucks/cars/planes
    > and reflective other buildings like hotels around the restaurant.
    >
    > Sit in the middle of the restaurant and boot up any GPS. Set the
    > display in very close so only the restaurant and surrounding properties
    > are on the display. Set tracking to on so we can watch the trail.
    >
    > Set and watch it. The fix is constantly in motion because the only
    > signal the GPS is receiving is a reflected signal soup off nearby
    > objects, moving vehicles, passing airplanes you can see out the windows,
    > but no good fix through the blocking roof. It's very easy to see the
    > fix sucks.
    >



    Drive the Interstates among metal-sheathed semi-trailers and this
    becomes quite apparent.



  12. #42
    nospam
    Guest

    Re: fanboy nonsense about netbook vs. iPad debunked

    In article <[email protected]>, John Navas
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    > That's because it's (cheaper) A-GPS (Assisted GPS),
    > which isn't as accurate as (mor expensive) standalone GPS.


    absolute nonsense. assisted gps gets a fix faster and just as accurate.



  13. #43
    nospam
    Guest

    Re: fanboy nonsense about netbook vs. iPad debunked

    In article <[email protected]>, Larry
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    > I'm surprised at you, John. GPS isn't a problem for receivers, by its
    > very analog nature, GPS requires a CLEAR, UNOBSTRUCTED, DIRECT PATH to
    > the birds.


    it doesn't with the better gps chipsets.

    > Go to any fast food joint you like that has a roof loaded with AC units,
    > preferably one with a steel roof to block all the direct signal to make
    > the problem worse. Pick one on a busy highway near a busy airport so we
    > don't have to wait to see the effect of the passing trucks/cars/planes
    > and reflective other buildings like hotels around the restaurant.
    >
    > Sit in the middle of the restaurant and boot up any GPS. Set the
    > display in very close so only the restaurant and surrounding properties
    > are on the display. Set tracking to on so we can watch the trail.
    >
    > Set and watch it. The fix is constantly in motion because the only
    > signal the GPS is receiving is a reflected signal soup off nearby
    > objects, moving vehicles, passing airplanes you can see out the windows,
    > but no good fix through the blocking roof. It's very easy to see the
    > fix sucks.


    nope. i've gotten a fix inside a steel frame building.



  14. #44
    nospam
    Guest

    Re: fanboy nonsense about netbook vs. iPad debunked

    In article <[email protected]>, Larry
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    > My puck stays in the car, plugged into a cig lighter USB charger when the
    > car is running. I think I took it out to show a guy with an iPhone and no
    > GPS about a year ago. There's a cover on my dash and the puck is under it
    > to keep it out of the sun. The heat doesn't seem to bother it.


    which means it won't work outside of the car. that's a huge drawback.

    > Why would you carry it, unless you're going for a walk in a strange city?


    location aware software.



  15. #45
    nospam
    Guest

    Re: fanboy nonsense about netbook vs. iPad debunked

    In article <[email protected]>, Larry
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    > For mobile, the bluetooth GPS is better...no wires and you can leave it in
    > the car. It even works into a restaurant still from the car, but I don't
    > see the point.


    yes, that's true. you don't see the point.



  • Similar Threads







  • Quick Reply Quick Reply

    If you are already a member, please login above.