ARRRRGGGHHHHHH!!!!!!!

On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 17:27:04 GMT, "R.M" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>BTW can you answer me a question? Did you sign up for the "Media Works"
>package? I an eager to hear if people are still able to get it after the
>so called expiration date.

Yes. There is no expiration date listed on the web page, so perhaps
they decided to make it a regular package?

http://www.cingular.com/media/multim...purchase#step2

--
Sloth Kills!
http://www.geocities.com/slothkills/

---

› See More: ARRRRGGGHHHHHH!!!!!!!

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <[email protected]> on Tue, 10 Aug 2004 18:41:40
-0700, Scott en Aztlan <[email protected]> wrote:

>On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 16:02:38 GMT, John Navas
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>>Um, OK - so how about an update? Or at least deleting the stuff that
>>>is no longer correct?
>>
>>As I wrote, most of the information is still accurate
>
>How is the reader to know which parts are accurate and which are not?

By using a modest amount of common sense.

>>(and probably more
>>accurate overall than the great majority of the information on the Internet.
>
>Well, that makes it all right then.

So tell us: do you have anything constructive to contribute, or is your sole
mission to tear down the contributions of others? ;-)

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>

On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 01:50:07 GMT, John Navas
<[email protected]> wrote:

>>>>Um, OK - so how about an update? Or at least deleting the stuff that
>>>>is no longer correct?
>>>
>>>As I wrote, most of the information is still accurate
>>
>>How is the reader to know which parts are accurate and which are not?
>
>By using a modest amount of common sense.

What an asinine response.

>>>(and probably more
>>>accurate overall than the great majority of the information on the Internet.
>>
>>Well, that makes it all right then.
>
>So tell us: do you have anything constructive to contribute, or is your sole
>mission to tear down the contributions of others? ;-)

If my posts here can help even one other person avoid wasting their
time following your incorrect advice, then I will consider my efforts
to be a constructive contribution.

--
Sloth Kills!
http://www.geocities.com/slothkills/

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <[email protected]> on Wed, 11 Aug 2004 10:00:14
-0700, Scott en Aztlan <[email protected]> wrote:

>On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 01:50:07 GMT, John Navas
><[email protected]> wrote:

>>>How is the reader to know which parts are accurate and which are not?
>>
>>By using a modest amount of common sense.
>
>What an asinine response.

In kind.

>>So tell us: do you have anything constructive to contribute, or is your sole
>>mission to tear down the contributions of others? ;-)
>
>If my posts here can help even one other person avoid wasting their
>time following your incorrect advice, then I will consider my efforts
>to be a constructive contribution.

Ahhh ... self-appointed "truth squad."

I didn't think so.

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>