DONE DEAL.

In article <[email protected]>,
John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:

> [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>
> In <[email protected]> on Tue, 26 Oct
> 2004 13:58:50 GMT, Jack Zwick <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >In article <[email protected]>,
> > John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> The open question is whether the size of such divestitures would trigger
> >> Cingular's option to walk from the deal (or whether Cingular would decide
> >> to
> >> go ahead with fewer divestitures and take the risk of litigation).
> >
> >Cingular agreed to the divestures. That's why Justice approved the
> >takeover.
>
> The deal is not yet done since neither the FCC nor the Court have yet spoken.
> Thus greater divestiture might still be required.
>
> <quibble> The approval of the DOJ is conditional on the divestitures, not
> any
> agreement. </quibble>

The deal is done!

<http://www.marketwatch.com/news/yhoo...yhoo&siteid=yh
oo&dist=yhoo&guid=%7B9566A25A%2DC18F%2D4F24%2DA041%2D73C9320FDC22%7D>

WASHINGTON (CBS.MW) -- Cingular Wireless on Tuesday completed its $41
billion purchase of AT&T Wireless shortly after receiving clearance from
U.S. regulators.

---

› See More: DONE DEAL.

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <[email protected]> on Tue, 26 Oct
2004 16:20:28 GMT, Jack Zwick <[email protected]> wrote:

>In article <[email protected]>,
> John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:

>> <quibble> The approval of the DOJ is conditional on the divestitures, not
>> any agreement. </quibble>
>
>The deal is done!
>
><http://www.marketwatch.com/news/yhoo...yhoo&siteid=yh
>oo&dist=yhoo&guid=%7B9566A25A%2DC18F%2D4F24%2DA041%2D73C9320FDC22%7D>

Actual press release from Cingular:
<http://www.prnewswire.com/mnr/cingular/20429/>

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>

In article <[email protected]>,
John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:

> [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>
> In <[email protected]> on Tue, 26 Oct
> 2004 16:20:28 GMT, Jack Zwick <[email protected]> wrote:
>
In article <[email protected]>,
John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:

> [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>
> In <[email protected]> on Tue, 26 Oct
> 2004 13:58:50 GMT, Jack Zwick <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >In article <[email protected]>,
> > John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> The open question is whether the size of such divestitures would trigger
> >> Cingular's option to walk from the deal (or whether Cingular would decide
> >> to
> >> go ahead with fewer divestitures and take the risk of litigation).
> >
> >Cingular agreed to the divestures. That's why Justice approved the
> >takeover.
>
> The deal is not yet done since neither the FCC nor the Court have yet spoken.
> Thus greater divestiture might still be required.
>
> <quibble> The approval of the DOJ is conditional on the divestitures, not
> any
> agreement. </quibble>

The deal is done!

> Actual press release from Cingular:
> <http://www.prnewswire.com/mnr/cingular/20429/>

Thanks for the URL, too bad you left out where you were saying the deal
wasn't being done:

While you were posting:

> The deal is not yet done since neither the FCC nor the Court have yet spoken.
> Thus greater divestiture might still be required.
>

THE DEAL W A S closing. But you hid your error by snipping my post to
purposely misrepresent what I said.

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <[email protected]> on Tue, 26 Oct
2004 17:08:21 GMT, Jack Zwick <[email protected]> wrote:

>In article <[email protected]>,
> John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:

>> Actual press release from Cingular:
>> <http://www.prnewswire.com/mnr/cingular/20429/>
>
>Thanks for the URL, too bad you left out where you were saying the deal
>wasn't being done:
>
>While you were posting:
>
>> The deal is not yet done since neither the FCC nor the Court have yet spoken.
>> Thus greater divestiture might still be required.
>
>THE DEAL W A S closing. But you hid your error by snipping my post to
>purposely misrepresent what I said.

The deal isn't completely done until the Court has approved the deal.

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>

In article <[email protected]>,
John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:

> [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>
> In <[email protected]> on Tue, 26 Oct
> 2004 17:08:21 GMT, Jack Zwick <[email protected]> wrote:
>
In article <[email protected]>,
John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:

> [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>
> In <[email protected]> on Tue, 26 Oct
> 2004 16:20:28 GMT, Jack Zwick <[email protected]> wrote:
>
In article <[email protected]>,
John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:

> [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>
> In <[email protected]> on Tue, 26 Oct
> 2004 13:58:50 GMT, Jack Zwick <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >In article <[email protected]>,
> > John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> The open question is whether the size of such divestitures would trigger
> >> Cingular's option to walk from the deal (or whether Cingular would decide
> >> to
> >> go ahead with fewer divestitures and take the risk of litigation).
> >
> >Cingular agreed to the divestures. That's why Justice approved the
> >takeover.
>
> The deal is not yet done since neither the FCC nor the Court have yet spoken.
> Thus greater divestiture might still be required.
>
> <quibble> The approval of the DOJ is conditional on the divestitures, not
> any
> agreement. </quibble>

The deal is done!

> Actual press release from Cingular:
> <http://www.prnewswire.com/mnr/cingular/20429/>

Thanks for the URL, too bad you left out where you were saying the deal
wasn't being done:

While you were posting:

> The deal is not yet done since neither the FCC nor the Court have yet spoken.
> Thus greater divestiture might still be required.
>

THE DEAL W A S closing. But you hid your error by snipping my post to
purposely misrepresent what I said.
>
> The deal isn't completely done until the Court has approved the deal.

The papers were filed yesterday. The deal is done, whether you believe
it or not.

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <[email protected]> on Tue, 26 Oct
2004 17:48:26 GMT, Jack Zwick <[email protected]> wrote:

>In article <[email protected]>,
> John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:

>>...

>THE DEAL W A S closing. But you hid your error by snipping my post to
>purposely misrepresent what I said.

Not true. (You need to turn down both the paranoia and the accusations.)

>> The deal isn't completely done until the Court has approved the deal.
>
>The papers were filed yesterday. The deal is done, whether you believe
>it or not.

As I wrote, the deal isn't completely done until the Court has approved it.

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>