Clamshell iPhone on the way

In article <[email protected]>, Todd Allcock
<[email protected]> wrote:

> At 21 Mar 2008 18:08:20 +1200 Anybody wrote:
>
> > It's the never-ending stream of twits who STILL think it's funny (and
> > original) to flip their phone open and say something like "Beam me up
> > Scotty". :-\
>
> Then I probably shouldn't admit my ringtone is the "woo-wheeee-woo" bosun
> whistle sound effect from the original series' ship's intercom? (Sure, the
> 'beep beep' or chirps of the communicator would be more authentic, but
> you'd never hear them in a loud room!)
>
> (And, for the record, I don't use a flip phone or ever uttered the words
> "Beam me up" into a cellphone.)
>
>
> Discovery Channel aired a cute documentary a couple of years ago called
> "How William Shatner Changed the World," starring the man himself, that
> (very tongue and cheekly) made the case that most modern day technology
> (like the Motorola flip phone) was inspired by, or copied from, Star Trek.

I don't watch the show, but there were promo adverts playing here this
week for Boston Legal that had a clip of Shatner's character opening a
flip-phone with Star Trek communicator noises.

They should then have had the next scene with Shanks' (who Shatner was
calling) phone ring with the Stargate movie theme.

---

› See More: Clamshell iPhone on the way

In article <duTEj.39735$C%[email protected]>,
"Todd Allcock" <[email protected]> wrote:

> "Kurt" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
> >> Personally, I prefer them. It keeps the screens safe and prevents the
> >> buttons from being pressed while in pockets without having to $pend
> >> extra on protectors and cases.
> >
> > I never have had that problem with my iPhone. It was designed to prevent
> > that.
>
> Partially by being so large there's no room for anything ELSE in the same
> pocket to damage it!

What you see in pictures can be deceptive. LOL

--
To reply by email, remove the word "space"

In article <[email protected]>,
Jeffrey Kaplan <[email protected]> wrote:

> Previously on alt.cellular.cingular, Todd Allcock said:
>
> > > I never have had that problem with my iPhone. It was designed to prevent
> > > that.
> >
> > Partially by being so large there's no room for anything ELSE in the same
> > pocket to damage it!
>
> The Treo is bigger.

I think most phones are at least fatter.
What phone out there is actually thinner? Without case, of course (no
external case on mine- Invisi-shield)

--
To reply by email, remove the word "space"

Previously on alt.cellular.cingular, Kurt said:

> > The Treo is bigger.
> I think most phones are at least fatter.
> What phone out there is actually thinner? Without case, of course (no
> external case on mine- Invisi-shield)

In the same class? At least one Blackberry is smaller overall.

--
Jeffrey Kaplan www.gordol.org
The from userid is killfiled Send personal mail to gordol

"Protests are as much use with the Vorlons as fairy wings on a cement
truck." (Mr. Garibaldi, B5 "Eyes")

"Todd Allcock" <[email protected]> wrote in
newspTEj.39733$C%[email protected]:

> Besides- my WinMo phone looks more like a tricorder than a
> communicator... (and not just because it's stinking huge!)
>
>
>

It has blinking lights and an egg vibrator on a cord??

"Jeffrey Kaplan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Previously on alt.cellular.cingular, Todd Allcock said:
>
>> > I never have had that problem with my iPhone. It was designed to
>> > prevent
>> > that.
>>
>> Partially by being so large there's no room for anything ELSE in the same
>> pocket to damage it!
>
> The Treo is bigger.

Thinner, anyway. I wouldn't really consider the Treo very "pocketable"
either.

Look, I'm a fan of "big" phones. Face it- the iPhone is a BIG phone, to
accomodate it's big display. That's an ADVANTAGE in my view- not a
disadvantage. I carry a brick myself- my HTC Wizard is nearly an inch
thick- well over an inch if I slap the extended battery pack on it.
However, since my first phone was an old analog Radio Shack (Nokia) handheld
patterned after the Motorola Ultra Classic that I bought in the early 90's,
(it was larger than a VHS tape, not even including the six-inch rubber
antenna!) it's hard for me to consider any modern phone "big" or "heavy"
after using some of the early analog handhelds I've lugged around!

At 22 Mar 2008 01:39:34 +0000 Larry wrote:

> > Besides- my WinMo phone looks more like a tricorder than a
> > communicator... (and not just because it's stinking huge!)
>
>
> It has blinking lights and an egg vibrator on a cord??


Yes to the blinking lights- flashing green for GSM, yellow for WiFi and
blue for bluetooth.

While we 're off on this nostalgic tangent, even as a kid I could never
understand how Spock could figure out what data was on those square plastic
UNLABELED memory chips they shoved into the ship computer. He'd shuffle a
stack of red, yellow and orange blank squares, pick one, scrutinize it's
empty face and say "the star chart for the Denebian Sector..." and plug it
in.

Perhaps the label was written in ultraviolet, infrared, or some other color
only Vulcan eyes could see... ;-)

At 21 Mar 2008 20:02:32 -0600 Todd Allcock wrote:

> > The Treo is bigger.
>
> Thinner, anyway. I wouldn't really consider the Treo very "pocketable"
> either.


Ooops! I meant the Treo is thicker! Sorry!

Todd Allcock <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:

> Perhaps the label was written in ultraviolet, infrared, or some other
> color only Vulcan eyes could see... ;-)
>
>

Nope. When he was holding it in his hand, he mind melded with it so he
could see what it contained.....in his logical mind....(c;

He didn't need "HUMAN" labels.

In article <[email protected]>,
Jeffrey Kaplan <[email protected]> wrote:

> Previously on alt.cellular.cingular, Kurt said:
>
> > > The Treo is bigger.
> > I think most phones are at least fatter.
> > What phone out there is actually thinner? Without case, of course (no
> > external case on mine- Invisi-shield)
>
> In the same class? At least one Blackberry is smaller overall.
Yes.
So none thinner?
Thinner is the key. iPhone easier to slip in and out of pocket. Treo was
bulky.

--
To reply by email, remove the word "space"

In article <[email protected]>,
Todd Allcock <[email protected]> wrote:

> At 21 Mar 2008 20:02:32 -0600 Todd Allcock wrote:
>
> > > The Treo is bigger.
> >
> > Thinner, anyway. I wouldn't really consider the Treo very "pocketable"
> > either.
>
>
> Ooops! I meant the Treo is thicker! Sorry!

I could never easily carry my Treo in my pocket. Plus, lint stuck to all
the nooks and crannies.

--
To reply by email, remove the word "space"

Previously on alt.cellular.cingular, Kurt said:

> > In the same class? At least one Blackberry is smaller overall.
> Yes.
> So none thinner?
> Thinner is the key. iPhone easier to slip in and out of pocket. Treo was
> bulky.

I think the Moto Q is thinner.

--
Jeffrey Kaplan www.gordol.org
The from userid is killfiled Send personal mail to gordol

"If I am ever the Hero top 100 list: #84. I almost certainly have an
Evil Twin running around somewhere, if not by birth then as a creation
of the Evil Overlord. I will keep an eye out for him, and plan
accordingly.

Per Kurt:
>I could never easily carry my Treo in my pocket. Plus, lint stuck to all
>the nooks and crannies.

Since breaking the belt hook on my iPod's holder, I've been
carrying it in my pocket.

Always careful to never carry change or keys in that pocket - in
fact there's *never* anything in the pocket except the iPod, my
cell phone, and or my PalmPilot.

In that time the screen has gone from a few marks here and there
to more-or-less totally marked up. In fact, a little longer and
I think all the marks may merge into a frosted glass effect.
--
PeteCresswell

In article <[email protected]>,
"(PeteCresswell)" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Per Kurt:
> >I could never easily carry my Treo in my pocket. Plus, lint stuck to all
> >the nooks and crannies.
>
> Since breaking the belt hook on my iPod's holder, I've been
> carrying it in my pocket.
>
> Always careful to never carry change or keys in that pocket - in
> fact there's *never* anything in the pocket except the iPod, my
> cell phone, and or my PalmPilot.
>
> In that time the screen has gone from a few marks here and there
> to more-or-less totally marked up. In fact, a little longer and
> I think all the marks may merge into a frosted glass effect.

That's why I bought the Invisibleshield when I bought my iPhone. No
marks on mine. Always in the pocket, too. Plus, the coating resists all
that smudging that the shiny glass attracts.

--
To reply by email, remove the word "space"