Quality of service in LA

In article <AWe8c.36263$%[email protected]>,
Jerome Zelinske <[email protected]> wrote:

> I guess that means that visible light penetrates objects better
> than x-rays do.

Duh - Visible light proves my point.



> Cell merger wrote:
> > Nice try. The higher the frequency the poorer the building penetration.
> > Simple
> > freshman college physics.
> >
> > 1.9 Ghz is worse than 0.8 Ghz
> >
>

---

› See More: Quality of service in LA

First of all, radio frequency energy is normally considered to be
from about 100 GHz on down. Light waves and above don't count.
As to whether long wave radio works "better" with MW than SW,
that's a red herring. We were discussing building penetration, not
how well RF bounces off the ionosphere.

--
John Richards, BSEE


"Jerome Zelinske" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:AWe8c.36263$%[email protected]...
> I guess that means that visible light penetrates objects better than x-rays do. And long range radio works better with
> Medium Wave than with Short Wave. OK
>
> Cell merger wrote:
>> Nice try. The higher the frequency the poorer the building penetration. Simple
>> freshman college physics.
>>
>> 1.9 Ghz is worse than 0.8 Ghz

In article <[email protected]>,=20
[email protected] says...
> Then tell us why people get different ansers from different CSRs.
>=20

Changing the subject. Again. I've LONG AGO admitted that this is a=20
problem. Rehashing old news won't change how wrong and dishonest=20
you've been in this thread, Phillie. Repeatedly so.

--=20
R=D8=DF
O/Siris
I work for Sprint PCS
I *don't* speak for them

"Jerome Zelinske" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:AWe8c.36263$%[email protected]...
> I guess that means that visible light penetrates objects better
> than x-rays do. And long range radio works better with Medium Wave than
> with Short Wave. OK

Ever wonder why the short wave antenna goes on the outside of the house?

>
> Cell merger wrote:
> > Nice try. The higher the frequency the poorer the building penetration.
Simple
> > freshman college physics.
> >
> > 1.9 Ghz is worse than 0.8 Ghz
> >
>

It was a while ago (before 3g) and I remember people complaining about LA,
NYC and Chicago among others. Thanks for the input.

Steve
B-More