JD Power Rankings 2003 for Wireless Carriers

You didn't prove anything. I never mentioned not liking the results.
By quoting me correctly you just proved yourself to be the idiot. Read
it again. I said alphabetical listings on the left, "best" companies on
the right..........NO DETAILS. That's what I said. Not once mentioning
caring about the results. Thank You and once again and for good this
time End of Discussion.............TROLL!!!!!

"Justin" <[email protected]> wrote in article
<[email protected]>:
>
> "Mr T" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > All you're doing is continuing a dead topic. I did not mention at all
> > in ANY post the results. Simply b/c I don't care about them. How can
> > you be correcting something I never said?
>
> Oh, so now that you got schooled, you want to drop it. I see. Here's
> EXACTLY what you said:
>
> > > > > I didn't say anything about a study. It must take some "REAL"
> research
> > > > > to list all the carriers in Alphabetical order on the left of the
> page
> > > > > and put a couple of them to the right of the page and say these are
> the
> > > > > best. That survey is a heap of crap unless they go into DETAILS.
>
> Now, don't get all pissy because I proved you to be a ****ing moron.
>
>

[posted via phonescoop.com]

---

› See More: JD Power Rankings 2003 for Wireless Carriers

Simply Stated, a survey with no details is just a list.

"Justin" <[email protected]> wrote in article
<[email protected]>:
>
> "Mr T" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > Of course potential customers and current customers do. The point was
> > his assumption was I didn't like the survey b/c Sprint was last. He is
> > obsessed with Sprint and I don't care about Sprint. He's a TROLL being
> > a TROLL.
> >
> > Camile Cardenas <[email protected]> wrote in article
> > <[email protected]>:
> > > In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] (Mr T)
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Who cares if Sprint's last? Maybe you do, being that you're obsessed
> > > > with Sprint. I don't care.
> > >
> > > Maybe potential customers do.
> >
> > [posted via phonescoop.com]
>
>
> No assumptions made:
>
> > > > > I didn't say anything about a study. It must take some "REAL"
> research
> > > > > to list all the carriers in Alphabetical order on the left of the
> page
> > > > > and put a couple of them to the right of the page and say these are
> the
> > > > > best. That survey is a heap of crap unless they go into DETAILS.
>
> That's what you posted. I was just pointing out that had you actually known
> how to search a web site, you would have found the actual standings, not in
> alphabetical order. Don't get all pissy now because someone corrected you.
>
> After all, what DO you have against the survey to post something like that
> if you "don't care"?
>
>
>

[posted via phonescoop.com]

"Mr T" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> You didn't prove anything. I never mentioned not liking the results.
> By quoting me correctly you just proved yourself to be the idiot. Read
> it again. I said alphabetical listings on the left, "best" companies on
> the right..........NO DETAILS. That's what I said. Not once mentioning
> caring about the results. Thank You and once again and for good this
> time End of Discussion.............TROLL!!!!!


And all I'm saying is that there was another report for the 2003 survey that
listed the companies, along with their total points, in the order in which
they ranked. I fail to see the point of your "alphabetical order" comment
if it wasn't to say that they didn't list the carriers in the order in which
they placed overall.

"Mr T" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Simply Stated, a survey with no details is just a list.

A survey without details is still a survey. Take it for what it's worth.
If you don't care, why do you try so hard to discredit it?

In article <[email protected]>,
"Thomas T. Veldhouse" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Tom Veldhouse

who doesnt care if catonHat trolls by changing his name, or if
Michael Arends does, or even if Michael Arends used to be Michael L.
Arends; or ven if VWZ guys chagnes his name more frequently than anyone.

If you agree Sprint is perfect, all restrictions are off.

If you agree wioth JD Power that SprintPCS has the worst cusotmer
service than whoever you are you must be Phillipe.

"Camile Cardenas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Tom Veldhouse
>
> who doesnt care if catonHat trolls by changing his name, or if
> Michael Arends does, or even if Michael Arends used to be Michael L.
> Arends; or ven if VWZ guys chagnes his name more frequently than anyone.
>
> If you agree Sprint is perfect, all restrictions are off.
>
> If you agree wioth JD Power that SprintPCS has the worst cusotmer
> service than whoever you are you must be Phillipe.

I am Phillipe.

"Trust me, I work for Sprint."
- Rob Viagra

In article <[email protected]>,
"Justin" <[email protected]> wrote:

> I am Phillipe.
>
> "Trust me, I work for Sprint."
> - Rob Viagra

"and I'm here to help you"

We have a deal on a nice recondi, uh I mean new phone for you.

In article <[email protected]>,=20
[email protected] says...
> And all I'm saying is that there was another report for the 2003 survey t=
hat
> listed the companies, along with their total points, in the order in whic=
h
> they ranked. I fail to see the point of your "alphabetical order" commen=
t
> if it wasn't to say that they didn't list the carriers in the order in wh=
ich
> they placed overall.
>=20

What that ignores, Justin, is that consumers don't go looking for press=20
releases. If they go to check out wireless carriers, they're going to=20
go look at the JDPA web site, click on the consumer's link, select=20
Telecom, then wireless. And when they get there, they're going to find=20
that Sprint PCS rates *not* at the bottom, nor at the top, but=20
respectably well in ever region of the country.

Why the disconnect, do you surmise?

--=20
-+-
R=D8=DF
O/Siris
I work for SprintPCS
I *don't* speak for them.

Keep telling yourself that. Maybe folks read third party reviews, which will
talk about JD Power. Or people talk to their friends who will experience the
bad Customer Service and on their own come to the same result as JD Power.
Sprint PCS customer service rates last and not respectably well.
Totally delusional - "respectably well", where did that phrase come from?

The churn rate proves that Sprint is at the bottom, and soon the wlnp loses
will too.


"O/Siris" <robjvargas@sprīntpcs.com> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
> And all I'm saying is that there was another report for the 2003 survey
that
> listed the companies, along with their total points, in the order in which
> they ranked. I fail to see the point of your "alphabetical order" comment
> if it wasn't to say that they didn't list the carriers in the order in
which
> they placed overall.
>

What that ignores, Justin, is that consumers don't go looking for press
releases. If they go to check out wireless carriers, they're going to
go look at the JDPA web site, click on the consumer's link, select
Telecom, then wireless. And when they get there, they're going to find
that Sprint PCS rates *not* at the bottom, nor at the top, but
respectably well in ever region of the country.

Why the disconnect, do you surmise?

--
-+-
RŲß
O/Siris
I work for SprintPCS
I *don't* speak for them.

In article <[email protected]>,=20
[email protected] says...
> Keep telling yourself that.
>=20

I'm not telling myself anything. JD Power is telling me that. Try it=20
for yourself. Look at the rankings in all six regions identified by JD=20
Power. It sure looks different in those rankings than the overall=20
results mentioned in the press release.

--=20
-+-
R=D8=DF
O/Siris
I work for SprintPCS
I *don't* speak for them.

On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 21:56:42 GMT, O/Siris <robjvargas@sprīntpcs.com>
wrote:

>I'm not telling myself anything. JD Power is telling me that. Try it
>for yourself. Look at the rankings in all six regions identified by JD
>Power. It sure looks different in those rankings than the overall
>results mentioned in the press release.


The regional rankings are from 2002. The National Rankings for 2003
rate SprintPCS last; and you know that, or are you trying to get
Justin to come back to explain JD Power to you again?

Even Sprint management accepts the results, everyone but Rob Vargas it
seems.

In article <[email protected]>,=20
[email protected] says...
> The regional rankings are from 2002.
>=20

That's not what the JD Powers web site says:

"Explore the voice of the consumer with ratings on selected=20
local telephone providers."

http://www.jdpower.com/cc/telecom/jd...eless/Find.jsp

Besides we ranked last in 2002 also, so the question remains the same, even=
if=20
they *are* 2002 results.

--=20
-+-
R=D8=DF
O/Siris
I work for SprintPCS
I *don't* speak for them.

For example, in my North Central area, while it lists nextel and
verizon as tied for first, by the symbol, but by the number of gold
balls nextel is higher.
Going by the number of gold balls, Sprint PCS would be in third
place.
If the actual data was available, the top three may be quite
tightly bunched.
I find it surprising that nextel ranked that high.


O/Siris wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>,
> [email protected] says...
>
>>The regional rankings are from 2002.
>>
>
>
> That's not what the JD Powers web site says:
>
> "Explore the voice of the consumer with ratings on selected
> local telephone providers."
>
> http://www.jdpower.com/cc/telecom/jd...eless/Find.jsp
>
> Besides we ranked last in 2002 also, so the question remains the same, even if
> they *are* 2002 results.
>