Nokia 6100 reception in US

Sorry for a duplicate message, but the other header was misleading.

I'm having terrible reception in the LA area with this new, beautiful phone.
I did better with a clunky Siemens that I didn't much like but that had a
protruding antenna. Is there anything to do to improve reception. I see lots
of ads for various devices. Thanks.
Howie

---

› See More: Nokia 6100 reception in US

On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 13:58:48 +0800, "tuned by RÄZO"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>first of all, use a 850 or 900Mhz network instead of 1800 or 1900Mhz
>
>


the 6100 is tri band 900/1800/1900

"eggster2k" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
| On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 13:58:48 +0800, "tuned by RÄZO"
| <[email protected]> wrote:
|
| >first of all, use a 850 or 900Mhz network instead of 1800 or 1900Mhz
| >
| >
|
|
| the 6100 is tri band 900/1800/1900

well, okies....but the main point (after ive tested out all the networks in
malaysia [900s and 1800s]) is i believe that 900 nets have much better
signal strength

OK, but I'm new at this. Do I have a choice about using a 900MHz network.
What on the phone would I adjust?
Thanks for any advice.
Howie

"tuned by RÄZO" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "eggster2k" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> | On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 13:58:48 +0800, "tuned by RÄZO"
> | <[email protected]> wrote:
> |
> | >first of all, use a 850 or 900Mhz network instead of 1800 or 1900Mhz
> | >
> | >
> |
> |
> | the 6100 is tri band 900/1800/1900
>
> well, okies....but the main point (after ive tested out all the networks
in
> malaysia [900s and 1800s]) is i believe that 900 nets have much better
> signal strength
>
>