Wall Street Journal, starting to catch my drift

In article <[email protected]>, News <[email protected]> wrote:

> >>>let's see, AAPL stocked jumped up 3.66 today, but the NASDAQ was down.
> >>>
> >>>and you were saying.............
> >>
> >>
> >>And this has what to do with your being clueless in your assertions over
> >>patents, market dominance and technology acceptance?
> >>
> >>The market as a whole was UP ... as was the NASDAQ UP.
> >>
> >>I'd get a new broker, if he's feeding you what you parroted back.
> >
> >
> > i would never use a broker, they are middlemen and are NEVER efficient /
> > or acceptable.
>
>
> Seems you can't negotiate rates/services.
>
> And you have bad info. NASDAQ was UP, chump.

nope, not when i posted the note chump.

---

› See More: Wall Street Journal, starting to catch my drift

none wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>, News <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>>>>let's see, AAPL stocked jumped up 3.66 today, but the NASDAQ was down.
>>>>>
>>>>>and you were saying.............
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>And this has what to do with your being clueless in your assertions over
>>>>patents, market dominance and technology acceptance?
>>>>
>>>>The market as a whole was UP ... as was the NASDAQ UP.
>>>>
>>>>I'd get a new broker, if he's feeding you what you parroted back.
>>>
>>>
>>>i would never use a broker, they are middlemen and are NEVER efficient /
>>>or acceptable.
>>
>>
>>Seems you can't negotiate rates/services.
>>
>>And you have bad info. NASDAQ was UP, chump.
>
>
> nope, not when i posted the note chump.


Selection bias, genius.

"News" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> none wrote:
>> In article <[email protected]>, News <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>let's see, AAPL stocked jumped up 3.66 today, but the NASDAQ was down.
>>>>
>>>>and you were saying.............
>>>
>>>
>>>And this has what to do with your being clueless in your assertions over
>>>patents, market dominance and technology acceptance?
>>>
>>>The market as a whole was UP ... as was the NASDAQ UP.
>>>
>>>I'd get a new broker, if he's feeding you what you parroted back.
>>
>>
>> i would never use a broker, they are middlemen and are NEVER efficient /
>> or acceptable.
>
> Seems you can't negotiate rates/services.
>
> And you have bad info. NASDAQ was UP, chump.

don't mind oxford / none especially when it somes to investing- he didn't
even know the 'common investor' could trade afterhours unil last year (when
i told him about it, then he complained that the common investor had to buy
in matched blocks (not true), only limt orders (you wouldn't want to do
anything else after hours), and large fees (not much different, if any).
then he complained he couldn't do it with his 'broker' (turned out you
could, and yup, he said his broker) then he still complained you had to buy
in blocks of 250, 500, 1000+ (not true)).

"none" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "ed" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> >> No patent that is specific enough to be enforceable is not so specific
>> >> that you can't find a way around it.
>> >
>> > but apple won't allow for that, it's something you are overlooking.
>> >
>> > show me someone that sells a click wheel like apple's ipod, bet you
>> > can't.
>>
>> um, you mean like on the lg vx8550?
>
> no ed, i meant one that works like the iPod click wheel which is legally
> impossible for another 12 years or so. gosh you are an idiot!

it spins round and round, and clicks in 4 directions. what's missing?

> http://www.phonearena.com/htmls/LG-V...-review-r_1776.
> html
>
> "The only Touch-Sensitive buttons are for the Left & Right Soft Keys,
> Speakerphone, and Clear."

yup- the wheel works like the earlier ipod wheels that actually spun (and
many people prefer).

none wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>, News <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>>>>> let's see, AAPL stocked jumped up 3.66 today, but the NASDAQ was
>>>>> down.
>>>>>
>>>>> and you were saying.............
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And this has what to do with your being clueless in your
>>>> assertions over patents, market dominance and technology
>>>> acceptance?
>>>>
>>>> The market as a whole was UP ... as was the NASDAQ UP.
>>>>
>>>> I'd get a new broker, if he's feeding you what you parroted back.
>>>
>>>
>>> i would never use a broker, they are middlemen and are NEVER
>>> efficient / or acceptable.
>>
>>
>> Seems you can't negotiate rates/services.
>>
>> And you have bad info. NASDAQ was UP, chump.
>
> nope, not when i posted the note chump.

Hate to tell you, but you are either really stupid, or a bold face liar.....
From this chart, (intraday for AAPL
http://www.smartmoney.com/eqsnaps/in...g&symbol=AAPL), it
didn't hit it highs until the market closed, by which time the nasdaq was
way up.... How can you post it went up a certain amount, until it had
actually gone up that amount, and which at that exact time the nasdaq as a
whole was higher?

Like the op said, you need a new broker, yours is lying to you (or you are
self investing, in which case you are lying to yourself

On Jul 12, 3:23 pm, none <[email protected]> wrote:

> put up all the 802.11 wireless antennas you want, you will NOT be
> harassed.
>
> mine is called "iPhone" and reaches around 800 feet, for free!
>
>

That's nice, but if all the cell phone users of the world started
using the 2.4GHz spectrum, even with 802.11G protocol, the SNR would
drop worse than a Digg.com article. Even a well engineered WiFI
network (not just a bunch of access points), has major problems with
seamless hand-off and security. And a leaky microwave oven could knock
out communication for blocks.