Results 1 to 15 of 16
- 11-18-2005, 02:38 PM #1Guest
Does anyone know if Razr phone from Motorola will be available from
sprint anytime soon?
› See More: Razr phone from Motorola
- 11-18-2005, 03:48 PM #2AnthonyGuest
Re: Razr phone from Motorola
I hope never.
- 11-18-2005, 07:59 PM #3David EmerlingGuest
Re: Razr phone from Motorola
<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Does anyone know if Razr phone from Motorola will be available from
> sprint anytime soon?
Although very slick looking, the reviews I've read on this phone have been
overwhelmingly negative.
- 11-18-2005, 09:36 PM #4Mij AdyawGuest
Re: Razr phone from Motorola
For the most part, Motorola phones have unsurpassed RF performance. Is this
not true for the Razr?
"David Emerling" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> Does anyone know if Razr phone from Motorola will be available from
>> sprint anytime soon?
>
> Although very slick looking, the reviews I've read on this phone have been
> overwhelmingly negative.
>
- 11-18-2005, 10:21 PM #5JayGuest
Re: Razr phone from Motorola
On 18 Nov 2005 12:38:36 -0800, [email protected] wrote:
>Does anyone know if Razr phone from Motorola will be available from
>sprint anytime soon?
No. We're gettin something much better:
http://www.phonescoop.com/articles/s...ndex.php?p=a91
- 11-18-2005, 10:50 PM #6mikeGuest
Re: Razr phone from Motorola
Why such a negativism? What's wrong with Razr or Motorola for that
matter?
If you know the facts - I'll be interested to listen. Please
explain.
The reason I am interested in Razr is because it is the most
esthetically pleasant phone on the market in my opinion and the most
comfortable to carry around.
I do realize we all have different taste in things, that is why I noted
above "in my opinion".
- 11-18-2005, 10:59 PM #7mikeGuest
Re: Razr phone from Motorola
Thanks for the link. I did not know about the Samsung copy of Razr. I
never hold it obviously yet, but judging by the pictures on that
website Razr still looks more appealing to me than A900.
A900 looks more rounded on the edges and Razr is... like it says Razr
- more sharp. Sorry, I just like the way Razr is engineered
design-wise.
As to the technical characteristics and robustness I have no idea about
any of these two. But isn't it true that Motorola was always more
trusted company in term of quality than Samsung? Am I mistaken?
- 11-18-2005, 11:22 PM #8Mij AdyawGuest
Re: Razr phone from Motorola
Does the new Samsung have Bluetooth?
"Jay" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On 18 Nov 2005 12:38:36 -0800, [email protected] wrote:
>
>>Does anyone know if Razr phone from Motorola will be available from
>>sprint anytime soon?
>
> No. We're gettin something much better:
>
> http://www.phonescoop.com/articles/s...ndex.php?p=a91
>
- 11-19-2005, 12:11 AM #9DecTxCowboyGuest
Re: Razr phone from Motorola
Mij Adyaw wrote:
> For the most part, Motorola phones have unsurpassed RF performance. Is this
> not true for the Razr?
Must have been a batch of bad Motorola phones - tried three of them and
all didn't compare to my Sayno.
- 11-19-2005, 02:07 PM #10JayGuest
Re: Razr phone from Motorola
On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 21:22:54 -0800, "Mij Adyaw" <[email protected]>
wrote:
>Does the new Samsung have Bluetooth?
>
Yup. Take a look at one of the screenshots:
http://www.phonescoop.com/articles/s..*****&h=img_2175
- 11-20-2005, 10:40 AM #11Mij AdyawGuest
Re: Razr phone from Motorola
That RULES! When can I get one from Sprint?
"Jay" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news[email protected]...
> On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 21:22:54 -0800, "Mij Adyaw" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>>Does the new Samsung have Bluetooth?
>>
>
> Yup. Take a look at one of the screenshots:
>
> http://www.phonescoop.com/articles/s..*****&h=img_2175
- 11-20-2005, 11:18 AM #12Steve SobolGuest
Re: Razr phone from Motorola
mike wrote:
> Why such a negativism? What's wrong with Razr or Motorola
Motorola makes complete junk. RF performance is good, generally (but even
that's not true of my T-Mobile Moto V188, its RF section sucks ass), but you
pay out the wazoo for a phone and the fit-and-finish of the phone are
uniformly horrible no matter which phone you get. Then there are the
occasional big software issues like the ones with the original Verizon
Wireless Moto T720 and the T-Mo Moto V180.
--
Steve Sobol, Professional Geek 888-480-4638 PGP: 0xE3AE35ED
Company website: http://JustThe.net/
Personal blog, resume, portfolio: http://SteveSobol.com/
E: [email protected] Snail: 22674 Motnocab Road, Apple Valley, CA 92307
- 11-20-2005, 01:19 PM #13Mij AdyawGuest
Re: Razr phone from Motorola
The best phone phone from an RF and ruggedness perspective that I ever had
was a Motorola V CDMA phone.
"Steve Sobol" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> mike wrote:
>> Why such a negativism? What's wrong with Razr or Motorola
>
> Motorola makes complete junk. RF performance is good, generally (but even
> that's not true of my T-Mobile Moto V188, its RF section sucks ass), but
> you pay out the wazoo for a phone and the fit-and-finish of the phone are
> uniformly horrible no matter which phone you get. Then there are the
> occasional big software issues like the ones with the original Verizon
> Wireless Moto T720 and the T-Mo Moto V180.
>
> --
> Steve Sobol, Professional Geek 888-480-4638 PGP: 0xE3AE35ED
> Company website: http://JustThe.net/
> Personal blog, resume, portfolio: http://SteveSobol.com/
> E: [email protected] Snail: 22674 Motnocab Road, Apple Valley, CA 92307
- 11-20-2005, 01:41 PM #14TinmanGuest
Re: Razr phone from Motorola
Mij Adyaw wrote:
> That RULES! When can I get one from Sprint?
I just heard, from some talking head demo'ing it on TV, that the A900
will be released this coming Friday. (I originally mistook it for the
Samsung IP-A790, which is of course already available.)
--
Mike
- 11-20-2005, 02:32 PM #15mikeGuest
Re: Razr phone from Motorola
Steve, thanks for response.
My primary and the only reason for having cell phone is talking. So
quality of sound and reception is the main points how I judge the
phone. Everything else is of no interest to me. For everything else I
have a computer and photo cameras. So if a phone needs some software
update to make it play game better or for some other reason -I
don't generally care as long as I can talk without interruption and
lost signal.
Having said that I always had an old Sanyo 4000 phone with sprint. Then
at some point switched to new (at that time) Samsung phones (sorry,
don't remember the model number). Those were not free phones; I
always pay for my phones and never buy cheap things. So, I only
switched the phones, service stayed the same. Guess what - I could
not get a signal in my own house after the switch, reception in all
other areas were very bad. After few months of discussion with Sprint
reps I simply went back to my old Sanyo phone. Everything went back to
normal - perfect reception everywhere.
Sorry, but after that I don't have much faith in Samsung phones. And
what I have heard about Motorola phones so far was that their reception
is far superior than most of the other brands.
Of course pone is not the only component that is responsible for good
reception. The other one is the network. And Sprint so far is pretty
good in my area (upstate NY), and some other states that I visit
sometimes. Unfortunately Sprint does not have Razr (and probably wont),
so I might take a risk and switch to Cingular just because of the phone
and see if their network is as good in my areas as Sprint.
Any comments are greatly appreciated.
Similar Threads
- Motorola
- Motorola
- Motorola RAZR
- alt.cellular.motorola
The Ukrainian Review
in Chit Chat