18 month changes - Is osiris wrong?

In article <rmarkoff-957BF6.09011501052004
@news04.east.earthlink.net>, [email protected] says...
> So for a rebate in the future you have to subscribe to Vision for 18=20
> months?
>=20

Nope. Not if you get the 3588i.

Don't want Vision? Don't get it.

--=20
R=D8=DF
O/Siris
I work for Sprint PCS
I *don't* speak for them

---

› See More: 18 month changes - Is osiris wrong?

"O/Siris" <0siris@sprîntpcs.com> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
In article <rmarkoff-957BF6.09011501052004
@news04.east.earthlink.net>, [email protected] says...
>> So for a rebate in the future you have to subscribe to Vision for 18
>> months?
>
>Nope. Not if you get the 3588i.
>Don't want Vision? Don't get it.

You imply that Vision is an all or nothing proposition.
It's not.
Some customers (like myself) just want to use it on trips
out of town, so we pay for it a la carte.
Why is Sprint suddenly turning its back on this type of customer?

--

John Richards

In article <[email protected]>,=20
[email protected] says...
> You imply that Vision is an all or nothing proposition.
> It's not.
> Some customers (like myself) just want to use it on trips
> out of town, so we pay for it a la carte.
> Why is Sprint suddenly turning its back on this type of customer?
>=20

I disagree that this qualifies as turning its back. It *does*=20
qualify as a very strong incentive to keep the pack.

And you haven't seen the complaints we get from customers warned=20
about casual usage the first they actually get a bill with those=20
fees. It's not a lot of users in number, but it's a huge headache=20
for us *and* the customer. A no-win situation. I can see why SPCS=20
wants to avoid that.

BTW, that's *not* to say I can't see some validity to your point. I=20
just don't see it exactly the same way.

--=20
R=D8=DF
O/Siris
I work for Sprint PCS
I *don't* speak for them