Number Porting yet?

Bob Smith wrote:

>
> "CAT0NHAT" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> > Phil just has to find some way to slam Sprint,
>>
>> No, I just object when an apologist like you trys to make excuses for
> Sprint
>> while they;re screwing someone over.
>
> Again, who is apologizing Phillipe?
>
> Bob

You know Bob, I thought I had missed something here. Where is the apology
here, Phil? So I go back to my original three questions to Phil:

1. When have I ever 'apologized' for something Sprint has done?
2. What is my 'vested interest' (Phil's words) in SPrint?
3. Where are the sources for the California judge throwing out the
Portability charge as excessive?

Not that I expect an answer to any of these- any truthful answer would
expose Phil for the troll that he is.

---

› See More: Number Porting yet?

CAT0NHAT <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Phil just has to find some way to slam Sprint,
>
> No, I just object when an apologist like you trys to make excuses for Sprint
> while they;re screwing someone over.

And ignore people when they supply facts or ask you to supply facts.

--
JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services
22674 Motnocab Road * Apple Valley, CA 92307-1950
Steve Sobol, Proprietor
888.480.4NET (4638) * 248.724.4NET * [email protected]

On 27 Oct 2003 23:25:39 GMT, [email protected] (CAT0NHAT) said:

>> Phil just has to find some way to slam Sprint,
>
>No, I just object when an apologist like you trys to make excuses for Sprint
>while they;re screwing someone over.

Where was he making excuses for Sprint? Where was someone getting
screwed over? Must you carry your bull**** into every ****ing thread
in this newsgroup? When are you going to realize that no one is
responding to the content of your comments, only how misplaced,
biased and often placed without facts to back them up. Many people
would ignore you but you keep changing your username so I assume you
are doing this on purpose.